FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the month of August, 2018
001-14832
(Commission File Number)
__________________________________________
CELESTICA INC.
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)
__________________________________________
844 Don Mills Road
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M3C 1V7
(416) 448-5800
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:
Form 20-F x | Form 40-F o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
Celestica Inc.
The information contained in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 of this Form 6-K is incorporated by reference into all effective registration statements (and into any prospectus that forms a part of any such registration statement) filed by Celestica Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and deemed to be a part thereof, from the date on which this report is furnished, to the extent not superseded by documents or reports subsequently filed or furnished by Celestica Inc. under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Celestica Inc. is voluntarily furnishing the certifications of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 99.3, 99.4 and 99.5.
Furnished Herewith (and incorporated by reference herein)
99.1 | ||
99.2 | ||
99.3 | ||
99.4 | ||
99.5 | ||
2
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CELESTICA INC. | ||
Date: August 1, 2018 | BY: | /S/ ELIZABETH L. DELBIANCO |
Elizabeth L. DelBianco | ||
Chief Legal and Administrative Officer | ||
3
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
99.1 | ||
99.2 | ||
99.3 | ||
99.4 | ||
99.5 | ||
4
Exhibit 99.1
CELESTICA INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) should be read in conjunction with our June 30, 2018 unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements (Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements), and our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2017 20-F), which includes our 2017 audited consolidated financial statements (2017 AFS). Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars. The information in this discussion is provided as of July 31, 2018 unless we indicate otherwise.
Certain statements contained in this MD&A constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (U.S. Exchange Act), and contain forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws. Such forward-looking information includes, without limitation, statements related to: the priorities outlined under the heading“Operating Goals and Principles”; our future growth, including in our Advanced Technology Solutions (ATS) segment; trends in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) industry, including the continuation of adverse market conditions, particularly in our Connectivity and Cloud Solutions (CCS) segment, and their anticipated impact on our business and results of operations; our anticipated financial and/or operational results (including our anticipated non-IFRS operating margin goal for the fourth quarter of 2018, and our anticipated non-IFRS annual adjusted effective tax rate for 2018); anticipated benefits from our cost efficiency initiative and anticipated increases in ATS segment revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018; our potential disengagement from certain CCS customer programs as a result of our comprehensive review of our CCS business, and potential declines in our CCS segment revenue, changes to our manufacturing network and/or additional restructuring actions as a result of such review and/or any disengagement from under-performing programs; our diversification plans (and potential hindrances thereto); the cash, working capital and other operational inefficiency or financial impacts associated with prolonged materials constraints; the impact of acquisitions and program wins, losses or disengagements on our revenues, liquidity, financial results and working capital requirements; anticipated expenses, restructuring actions and charges, capital expenditures and other anticipated working capital requirements, including the anticipated amounts, timing, impact and funding thereof; the anticipated impact of any new significant tariffs on items imported from China or other countries into the U.S. and related countermeasures on our operations; the anticipated repatriation of undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries; the impact of tax and litigation outcomes; our cash flows, financial goals and current priorities, including our intention to focus on evolving our revenue, achieving mid-range and longer-term goals (including with respect to ATS segment revenue, non-IFRS operating margin, segment margins, ATS segment income contribution, and returning capital to our shareholders), and our capital allocation framework; intended investments in our business; changes in our revenue mix; our ability to diversify and grow our customer base and develop new capabilities; the expected impact of the acquisition of Atrenne Integrated Solutions, Inc. (Atrenne) on our position in the aerospace and defense and industrial markets; the effect of the pace of technological changes, customer outsourcing and program transfers, and the global economic environment on customer demand; raw materials prices; our intention to settle outstanding equity awards with subordinate voting shares; our intended method of funding repurchases of subordinate voting shares under our normal course issuer bid (NCIB); the expected timing of the collection of outstanding solar accounts receivable and the possibility of future write-downs on unrecovered amounts from such solar receivables; the impact of outstanding indebtedness under our credit facility on our liquidity, future operations and financial condition; the timing and terms of the sale of our real property in Toronto and related transactions, including the expected lease of our new corporate headquarters (collectively, the Toronto Real Property Transactions); the costs, timing and execution of relocating our existing Toronto manufacturing operations and corporate headquarters (including our expectation that the costs of such relocations will be more than offset by the cash proceeds from the property sale, if consummated); the anticipated impact of the recent U.S. tax reform on our operations and future tax expense; the impact of new wins, recent program transfers, and acquisitions; the timing of the adoption of, and transition activities related to, newly-issued accounting standards; the impact of longer-term contracts; our expectations with respect to increasing fulfillment services offered to customers; the potential use of cash, securities issuances and likely increase in third-party indebtedness to fund our operations or acquisitions, and the potential adverse impacts of such uses and/or increase on our liquidity, subordinate voting share price, debt leverage, agency ratings, business and/or operations; the potential impact of Britain's intention to leave the European Union (Brexit) and/or policies or legislation proposed or instituted by the current administration in the U.S. on the economy, financial markets, currency exchange rates and our business; the potential true-up premium on the annuity purchased for our U.K Main pension plan; our intentions with respect to our U.K. Supplementary pension plan and the potential true-up premium on the annuity purchased with respect thereto; the expected impact of the expiration of one of our income tax incentives in Thailand; and the timing of, and o
1
ur intention to, enter into an interest rate swap with respect to half of the outstanding balance on our new term loan. Such forward-looking statements may, without limitation, be preceded by, followed by, or include words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “continues,” “project,” “potential,” “possible,” “contemplate,” “seek,” or similar expressions, or may employ such future or conditional verbs as “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “should” or “would,” or may otherwise be indicated as forward-looking statements by grammatical construction, phrasing or context. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and applicable Canadian securities laws.
Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of assisting readers in understanding management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from conclusions, forecasts or projections expressed in such forward-looking statements, including, among others, risks related to: our customers’ ability to compete and succeed in the marketplace with the services we provide and the products we manufacture; customer and segment concentration and the challenges of diversifying our customer base and replacing revenue from completed or lost programs or customer disengagements, which could be driven by a number of factors, including but not limited to operating performance, supply base consolidation, or our ability to achieve acceptable financial returns; changes in our mix of customers and/or the types of products or services we provide; higher concentration of fulfillment services and/or other lower margin programs impacting gross profit; price, margin pressures, including from customer re-negotiations, and other competitive factors affecting, and the highly competitive nature of, the EMS industry in general and our CCS segment in particular; responding to changes in demand, rapidly evolving and changing technologies, and changes in our customers’ business and outsourcing strategies, including the insourcing of programs; customer, competitor and/or supplier consolidation; integrating any acquisitions or strategic transactions (including “operate-in-place” arrangements and our recent acquisition of Atrenne), and achieving the anticipated benefits therefrom; retaining or expanding our business due to execution or quality issues (including our ability to successfully resolve these challenges); our having sufficient financial resources and working capital to fund currently anticipated financial obligations and to pursue desirable business opportunities, and potential negative impacts on our liquidity, financial condition and/or results of operations resulting from significant uses of cash and/or any future securities issuances or increased third-party indebtedness for acquisitions or to otherwise fund our operations; delays in the delivery and availability of components, services and materials, including from suppliers upon which we are dependent for certain components; our restructuring actions, including achieving the anticipated benefits therefrom, and the potential negative impact of transitions resulting from our restructuring actions on our operations; the incurrence of future impairment charges or other write-downs of assets; managing our operations, growth initiatives, and our working capital performance during uncertain market and economic conditions; disruptions to our operations, or those of our customers, component suppliers and/or logistics partners, including as a result of global or local events outside of our control (including as a result of Brexit, policies or legislation proposed or instituted by the current U.S. administration, including with respect to taxes and tariffs, and/or countermeasures implemented by other governments in response thereto); the expansion or consolidation of our operations; recruiting or retaining skilled talent; changes to our operating model; changing commodity, material and component costs as well as labor costs and conditions; defects or deficiencies in our products, services or designs; non-performance by counterparties; our financial exposure to foreign currency volatility, including fluctuations that may result from Brexit and/or the policies or legislation proposed or instituted by the current U.S. administration; managing our global operations and supply chain; our dependence on industries affected by rapid technological change; increasing income and other taxes, tax audits, and challenges of defending our tax positions, and obtaining, renewing or meeting the conditions of tax incentives and credits; the potential that conditions to closing the Toronto Real Property Transactions may not be satisfied on a timely basis or at all; the costs, timing and/or execution of relocating our existing Toronto manufacturing operations and/or corporate headquarters proving to be other than anticipated; computer viruses, malware, hacking attempts or outages that may disrupt our operations; the variability of revenue and operating results; compliance with applicable laws, regulations, government grants and social responsibility initiatives; and current or future litigation, governmental actions, and/or changes in legislation. The foregoing and other material risks and uncertainties are discussed in our public filings at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, including in this MD&A, our 2017 20-F filed with, and subsequent reports on Form 6-K furnished to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and as applicable, the Canadian Securities Administrators.
Our forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions, many of which involve factors that are beyond our control. Our material assumptions include those related to the following: production schedules from our customers, which generally range from 30 to 90 days and can fluctuate significantly in terms of volume and mix of products or services; the timing and execution of, and investments associated with, ramping new business (including new business associated with acquisitions); the successful pursuit, completion and integration of acquisitions; the success in the marketplace of our customers’ products; the pace of change in our traditional businesses (CCS segment) and our ability to retain programs and customers; the stability of general economic
2
and market conditions, currency exchange rates, and interest rates; our pricing, the competitive environment and contract terms and conditions; supplier performance, pricing and terms; compliance by third parties with their contractual obligations, the accuracy of their representations and warranties, and the performance of their covenants; the costs and availability of components, materials, services, plant and capital equipment, labor, energy and transportation; the extent of the recently-imposed tariffs and countermeasures and our customers' liability for any such costs; operational and financial matters including the extent, timing and costs of replacing revenue from completed or lost programs, or customer disengagements; technological developments; that the impact of the recent U.S. tax reform on our operations will be as we currently anticipate; our ability to recover accounts receivable outstanding from a former solar supplier; the timing, execution and effect of restructuring actions; the successful resolution of quality issues that arise from time to time; our having sufficient financial resources and working capital to fund currently anticipated financial obligations and to pursue desirable business opportunities; our ability to diversify our customer base and develop new capabilities; the availability of cash resources for repurchases of outstanding subordinate voting shares under our current NCIB; compliance with applicable laws and regulations pertaining to NCIBs; that we are able to successfully integrate Atrenne and achieve the expected benefits from the acquisition; that the sale of our Toronto real property will be consummated by early 2019, and that we will be able to successfully execute on the goals and principles outlined under the heading“Operating Goals and Principles” by maintaining those objectives we are successfully achieving currently and improving and evolving to meet the further objectives going forward. While management believes these assumptions to be reasonable under the current circumstances, they may prove to be inaccurate. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.
Overview
Celestica's business:
We deliver innovative supply chain solutions globally to customers in two operating and reportable segments: Advanced Technology Solutions (ATS) and Connectivity & Cloud Solutions (CCS). Our ATS segment consists of our ATS end market, and is comprised of our aerospace and defense, industrial, smart energy, healthtech, semiconductor capital equipment, and consumer businesses. Our CCS segment consists of our Communications and Enterprise end markets, and is comprised of our enterprise communications, telecommunications, servers and storage businesses. All period percentages and financial information herein reflect the current presentation. Information regarding our reportable segments is included in note 4 to our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements, filed at www.sedar.com and furnished with this MD&A on Form 6-K at www.sec.gov.
Our global headquarters is located in Toronto, Canada. We operate a network of sites and centers of excellence strategically located in North America, Europe and Asia, with specialized end-to-end supply chain capabilities tailored to meet specific market and customer product lifecycle requirements.
We offer a comprehensive range of product manufacturing and related supply chain services to customers in both of our segments, including design and development, new product introduction, engineering services, component sourcing, electronics manufacturing and assembly, testing, complex mechanical assembly, systems integration, precision machining, order fulfillment, logistics and after-market repair and return services. Within design and development, our Joint Design and Manufacturing (JDM) offering includes the creation of design solutions in collaboration with customers, as well as the management of aspects of the supply chain and manufacturing.
Revenue from our ATS segment currently represents approximately one-third of our aggregate revenue but generates over one-half of our total segment income. Products and services in this segment are extensive and are often more regulated than in our CCS segment, and can include the following: government-certified and highly-specialized manufacturing, electronic and enclosure-related services for aerospace and defense-related customers; high-precision equipment and integrated subsystems used in the manufacture of semiconductors; a wide range of industrial automation, controls, test and measurement devices; advanced solutions for surgical instruments, diagnostic imaging and patient monitoring; and efficiency products to help manage and monitor the energy and power industries. Our ATS segment businesses typically have a higher margin profile and longer product life cycles than the businesses in our CCS segment. Revenue from our CCS segment currently represents approximately two-thirds of our aggregate revenue and generates less than one-half of our total segment income. Products and services in this segment consist predominantly of enterprise-level data communications and information processing infrastructure products, and can include routers, switches,
3
servers and storage-related products used by a wide range of businesses and cloud-based service providers to manage digital connectivity, commerce and social media applications. Our CCS segment businesses typically have a lower margin profile and higher volumes than the businesses in our ATS segment, and have been impacted in recent periods (and continue to be impacted) by aggressive pricing, rapid shifts in technology, model obsolescence and the commoditization of certain products.
To increase the value we deliver to our customers, we continue to make investments in people, value-added service offerings, new capabilities, capacity, technology, IT systems, software and tools. We continuously work to improve our productivity, quality, delivery performance and flexibility in our efforts to be recognized as a leading company in the EMS industry. We have invested in automation and the connected factory to streamline our processes and reduce costs. Our current cost efficiency initiative, and related restructuring actions, are also intended to further streamline our business, increase operational efficiencies and improve our productivity.
Operating Goals and Principles:
Our current priorities are focused on evolving our revenue portfolio; expanding operating and segment margins; and maintaining a balanced approach to capital allocation. Management believes that each of these goals and principles is reasonable.
Evolving our Revenue Portfolio — To evolve our revenue portfolio, we intend to focus on: (i) realigning our portfolio towards more diversified revenue, (ii) driving sustainable profitable revenue growth, (iii) growing our ATS segment revenue organically by an average of 10% per year over the long term, (iv) supplementing our organic growth with disciplined, targeted acquisitions intended to expand capabilities, and (v) optimizing and reshaping our portfolio to drive more consistent returns and profitability.
Expanding Margins — With respect to expanding margins, over the next one to three years we intend to focus on achieving (i) non-IFRS operating margins in the target range of 3.5% to 4.0%, (ii) ATS segment margins in the target range of 5.0% to 6.0%, (iii) CCS segment margins in the target range of 2.0% to 3.0%, and (iv) greater than 50% of total segment income from our ATS segment.
Balanced Approach to Capital Allocation — In terms of capital allocation, we are focused on: (i) returning approximately 50% of free cash flow to shareholders annually, on average, over the long term, (ii) investing 1.5% to 2.0% of annual revenue in capital expenditures to support our organic growth, and (iii) executing on strategic acquisitions as part of a disciplined capital allocation framework. We are also focused on maintaining a strong balance sheet.
The foregoing priorities and areas of intended focus constitute our objectives and goals, and are not intended to be projections or forecasts of future performance. Our future performance is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from the goals and priorities described above.
Operating margin and free cash flow are non-IFRS measures without standardized meanings and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. See “Non-IFRS measures” below for a discussion of the non-IFRS measures included herein, and a reconciliation of our non-IFRS measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. We do not provide reconciliations for forward-looking non-IFRS financial measures, as we are unable to provide a meaningful or accurate calculation or estimation of reconciling items and the information is not available without unreasonable effort. This is due to the inherent difficulty of forecasting the timing or amount of various events that have not yet occurred, are out of our control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted, and that would impact the most directly comparable forward-looking IFRS financial measure. For these same reasons, we are unable to address the probable significance of the unavailable information. Forward-looking non-IFRS financial measures may vary materially from the corresponding IFRS financial measures. Segment performance is evaluated based on segment revenue, segment income and segment margin (segment income as a percentage of segment revenue), each of which is defined in “Operating Results — Segment income and margin” below.
Our CCS segment generally experiences a high degree of volatility in terms of revenue and product/service mix, as well as recent negative pricing pressures, which have significantly impacted our profitability in recent quarters. We expect these conditions to continue throughout 2018. As part of our strategy to continue to diversify our business and improve shareholder returns, we are undertaking a comprehensive review of our CCS business, with the intention of addressing under-performing
4
programs. This review could ultimately result in our disengagement from certain customer programs if we determine that financial returns from such programs are not anticipated to contribute to improved consistency in our revenues and operating margins for such segment. This could in turn result in corresponding declines in our CCS segment revenue, changes to our manufacturing network, and/or additional restructuring actions. We intend to continue to invest in areas we believe are key to the long-term success of our CCS segment, including our JDM offering, to help drive improved CCS financial performance in future periods. We are also pursuing new customers and acquisition opportunities in our ATS segment to expand our end market penetration, to diversify our end market mix, and to enhance and add new technologies and capabilities to our offerings. Within both our CCS and ATS segments, we are focused on higher-value added services, including design and development, engineering, and after-market services. In support of our expansion efforts, we have executed two “operate-in-place” outsourcing agreements with existing aerospace and defense customers, pursuant to which we provide manufacturing and after-market repair services for specific product lines at such customers' sites, and have recently completed the acquisitions of Lorenz, Inc. and Suntek Manufacturing Technologies, SA de CV, collectively known as Karel Manufacturing (Karel) and Atrenne (see “Operating Results — Recent Acquisitions and Program Transfer” below).
As we expand our business, open new sites, or transfer business within our network to accommodate growth or achieve synergies, however, we may encounter difficulties that result in higher than expected costs associated with such activities. Potential difficulties related to such activities include our ability: to manage growth effectively; to maintain existing business relationships during periods of transition; to anticipate disruptions in our operations that may impact our ability to deliver to customers on time, produce quality products and ensure overall customer satisfaction; and to respond rapidly to changes in customer demand or volumes. We may also encounter difficulties in ramping and executing new programs. We may require significant investments in additional capabilities and increased working capital to support these new programs, including those associated with business acquisitions, and may generate lower margins or losses during and/or following the ramp period. There can be no assurance that our increased investments will benefit our financial performance or result in business growth. As we pursue opportunities in new markets or technologies, we may encounter challenges due to our limited knowledge or experience in these areas. In addition, the success of new business models or programs depends on a number of factors including: understanding the new business or markets; timely and successful product development; market acceptance; the effective management of purchase commitments and inventory levels in line with anticipated demand; the development or acquisition of appropriate intellectual property and capital investments, to the extent required; the availability of materials in adequate quantities and at appropriate costs to meet anticipated demand; and the risk that new offerings may have quality or other defects in the early stages of introduction. Any of these factors could prevent us from realizing the anticipated benefits of growth in our business, including in new markets or technologies, which could materially adversely affect our business and operating results.
Overview of business environment:
The EMS industry is highly competitive, with multiple global EMS providers competing for customers and programs. In addition, demand can be volatile from period to period, and aggressive pricing is a common business dynamic, particularly in our CCS segment. As a result, customer and CCS segment revenue and mix, and overall profitability, are difficult to forecast. Product lifecycles in the markets we serve, production lead times required by our customers, rapid shifts in technology, model obsolescence, commoditization of certain products, the emergence of new business models (including Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS)), shifting patterns of demand, such as the shift from traditional network infrastructures to highly virtualized and cloud-based environments, the prevalence of solid state or flash memory technology as a replacement for hard disk drives, as well as the proliferation of software-defined technologies enabling the disaggregation of software and hardware, increased competition, oversupply of products, pricing pressures, and the volatility of the economy all contribute to the complexity of managing our operations and fluctuations in our financial results. For example, declines in demand for customer-specific proprietary systems in favor of open systems with standardized technologies has had, and is expected to continue to have, an adverse impact on our CCS segment customers, and consequently, our business. Capacity utilization, customer mix and the types of products and services we provide are important factors affecting our financial performance. The number of sites, the location of qualified personnel, the manufacturing capacity, and the mix of business through that capacity are vital considerations for EMS providers in terms of supporting their customers and generating appropriate returns. Because the EMS industry is working capital intensive, we believe that adjusted ROIC (discussed in “Non-IFRS measures” below), which is primarily based on non-IFRS operating earnings and investments in working capital and equipment, is an important metric for measuring an EMS provider’s financial performance.
In addition, uncertainty in the global economy and financial markets may impact current and future demand for our customers' products and services, and consequently, our operations. We continue to monitor the dynamics and impacts of the global
5
economic and financial environment and work to manage our priorities, costs and resources to anticipate and prepare for any changes we deem necessary.
External factors that could adversely impact the EMS industry and our business include natural disasters and related disruptions, political instability, terrorism, armed conflict, labor or social unrest, criminal activity, disease or illness that affects local, national or international economies, unusually adverse weather conditions, and other risks present in the jurisdictions in which we, our customers, our suppliers, and/or our logistics partners operate. These types of events could disrupt operations at one or more of our sites or those of our customers, component suppliers and/or our logistics partners. These events could also lead to higher costs or supply shortages or may disrupt the delivery of components to us, or our ability to provide finished products or services to our customers, any of which could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, uncertainties resulting from Brexit (given the lack of comparable precedent) and/or policies or legislation proposed or instituted by the current administration in the U.S., and/or increased tensions with North Korea, China, Russia and/or other countries, may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The current U.S. administration has called for substantial changes to international trade agreements, including the North American Free Trade Agreement, and has increased tariffs on certain items imported into the U.S. from several countries, including China, Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. Each of these countries has imposed retaliatory tariffs on specified items, which have been challenged by the U.S. These actions, or other governmental actions related to tariffs or international trade agreements, could increase the cost to our U.S. customers who use our non-U.S. manufacturing sites and components, and vice versa, which may materially and adversely impact demand for our services, our results of operations or our financial condition. We currently ship a significant portion of our worldwide production to customers in the U.S. from other countries. Increased tariffs (which are generally borne by our customers), and/or changes to international trade agreements, may cause our U.S. customers to insource programs previously outsourced to us, transfer manufacturing to locations within our global network that are not impacted by such actions (potentially increasing production costs), and/or shift their business to other EMS providers. Additionally, tariffs on imported components for use in our U.S. production could have an adverse impact on demand for such production. Retaliatory tariffs could reduce demand for our U.S.-based production or make such production less profitable. Given the uncertainty regarding the scope and duration of these trade actions by the U.S. and other governments, whether trade tensions will escalate further, and whether our customers will bear the related costs, their impact on our operations and results cannot be currently quantified, but may be material.
In general, changes in U.S. social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, taxation, manufacturing, clean energy, the healthcare industry, development and investment in the jurisdictions in which we, and/or our customers or suppliers operate, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Overview — Overview of business environment” of our 2017 20-F.
We have significant suppliers that are important to our sourcing activities. If a key supplier (or any company within such supplier's supply chain) experiences financial or other difficulties, this may affect its ability to supply us with materials, components or services, which could halt or delay the production of a customer's products, and/or have a material adverse impact on our operations, financial results and customer relationships.
We continue to experience materials constraints from certain suppliers in both our segments, due in part to industry-wide shortages for certain electronic components. These shortages caused delays in the production of customer products, and required us to carry higher than expected levels of inventory, commencing in 2017 and continuing into 2018. We expect these materials constraints and adverse impacts to continue until the supply environment improves. These supply constraints may result in higher materials costs, adversely impacting our financial results if we are unable to recover such increases from our customers.
Our ability to collect our accounts receivable and achieve future sales depends, in part, on the financial strength of our customers. If any of our customers have insufficient liquidity, we could encounter significant delays or defaults in payments owed to us by such customers, or we may extend our payment terms, which could adversely impact our short-term cash flows, financial condition and/or operating results. From time to time, we have extended the payment terms applicable to certain customers, which has adversely impacted our working capital requirements, and increased our financial exposure and credit risk. In addition, customer financial difficulties or changes in demand for our customers' products may result in order cancellations and us carrying higher
6
than expected levels of inventory, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our operating results and working capital performance. We may not be able to return or re-sell this inventory, or we may be required to hold the inventory for a period of time, any of which may result in our having to record additional reserves for the inventory. We also may be unable to recover all of the amounts owed to us by a customer, including amounts to cover unused inventory or capital investments we incurred to support that customer's business. Furthermore, if a customer bankruptcy occurs, our profitability may be adversely impacted by our failure to collect our accounts receivable in excess of our estimated allowance for uncollectible accounts or amounts insured (which occurred with respect to one of our solar customers during 2017, whose bankruptcy caused us to record accounts receivable provisions). Our failure to collect accounts receivable and/or the loss of one or more major customers could have an adverse effect on our operating results, financial position and cash flows. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Overview— Overview of business environment” of our 2017 20-F.
Our business, particularly in our CCS segment, is dependent on the award of new programs. Customers may shift production between EMS providers (including shifts to our competitors) for a number of reasons, including changes in demand for their products, pricing concessions, more favorable terms and conditions, execution or quality issues, their preference or need to consolidate their supply chain capacity or change their supply chain partners, tax benefits, new trade policies or legislation, or consolidation among customers. Customers may also choose to increase the amount of business they outsource, insource previously outsourced business, or change the concentration or location of their EMS suppliers to better manage their supply continuity risk. These customer decisions may impact, among other items, our revenue and margins, the need for future restructuring, the level of capital expenditures and our cash flows.
While the demand environment remains volatile, driven largely by technology shifts and increased competition in our CCS segment, we remain committed to making investments we believe are required to support our long-term objectives and to create shareholder value. These efforts include a focus on the diversification of our customer mix and product portfolios to address changing needs, including a larger emphasis on fulfillment and after-market services, as well as broadening our ATS segment capabilities, including expanding our aerospace and defense, healthtech, smart energy, and industrial offerings, and continuing to expand the breadth of our JDM offerings in the areas of network switching and converged storage and servers. The costs of investments that we deem desirable may be prohibitive, however, and therefore prevent us from achieving these diversification objectives. In addition, the ramping activities associated with investments that we do make may be significant and could negatively impact our margins in the short and medium term. Simultaneously, we intend to continue to manage our costs and resources to maximize our efficiency and productivity.
Recent developments:
Refinancing:
In June 2018, we entered into a new $800.0 million credit facility (New Credit Facility) which consists of a $350.0 million term loan (New Term Loan) that matures in June 2025, and a $450.0 million revolving credit facility (New Revolver) that matures in June 2023. The net proceeds from the New Term Loan were used primarily to repay all amounts outstanding under our previous credit facility (Prior Facility), which was terminated on such repayment, as well as costs related to the arrangement of the New Credit Facility. Our Prior Facility consisted of a $300.0 million revolving credit facility (Prior Revolver), and a $250.0 million term loan (Prior Term Loan), each of which was scheduled to mature in May 2020. As of June 30, 2018, the full amount of the New Term Loan was outstanding, and other than ordinary course letters of credit, there were no amounts outstanding under the New Revolver.
Completion of Atrenne Acquisition:
On April 4, 2018, we completed the acquisition of U.S.-based Atrenne, a designer and manufacturer of ruggedized electromechanical solutions. This acquisition is intended to expand our capabilities, improve our diversification, and bolster our leadership position within the aerospace and defense market. Atrenne's capabilities include connectors, machining, and the thermal and mechanical design and manufacture of ruggedized chassis and enclosures, primarily for military and commercial aerospace applications. We also believe that Atrenne's capabilities in the design and manufacture of value-added mechanical solutions will expand our service offerings for our industrial customers. The purchase price for Atrenne was $141.7 million, net of cash acquired, including a net working capital adjustment of $3.8 million (which is subject to finalization). The purchase was funded with borrowings under the Prior Revolver. In connection with our purchase of Atrenne, we recorded a $1.6 million fair value adjustment to write up the value of the acquired inventory as of the acquisition date, representing the difference between the inventory's cost and its fair value. The fair value adjustment is recognized through cost of sales as the inventory is sold. During the second quarter of 2018, we recognized the full $1.6 million fair value adjustment (as such acquired inventory was sold during the quarter), which negatively impacted our gross profit and net earnings for the period. We also recorded $64.0 million of goodwill which is attributable primarily to the specific knowledge and capabilities of the acquired workforce and expected synergies from the combination of our operations. See note 5 to our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements.
Segment Reorganization:
During the first quarter of 2018, we completed a reorganization of our reporting structure, including our sales, operations and management systems, into two operating and reportable segments: ATS and CCS. Our prior period financial information has been reclassified to reflect the reorganized segment structure and to conform to the current presentation. The changes to our segment structure had no impact on our historical consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as previously reported. Information regarding our reportable segments is included in note 4 to our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements.
See “Overview — Celestica's business” above for a description of the products, services and characteristics of each of our ATS and CCS segments. The competitive landscape in our CCS segment remains aggressive, as demand growth continues to move from traditional enterprise network infrastructure providers to cloud-based service providers, resulting in aggressive bidding from EMS providers and increased competition from original design manufacturers as they further penetrate these markets. In addition, although we offer a broad range of services to our CCS customers, we have experienced a shift in the mix of our programs, including growth in our lower-margin fulfillment services, particularly in the first half of 2018 as compared to the prior year period. This shift in mix, combined with the pricing pressures described above, demand volatility, and investments we have made to grow our higher-value added after-market services, resulted in lower segment income and margins in our CCS segment during the first and second quarters of 2018 than in the prior-year periods. See “Operating Results” below. As a result of the high concentration of our business in the CCS marketplace, we expect continued competitive pressures, aggressive pricing and technology-driven demand shifts, as well as certain materials constraints, to continue to negatively impact our CCS businesses and overall profitability in future periods. See “Overview — Celestica's business” above for a discussion of a comprehensive review of our CCS business we are undertaking to address under-performing programs and identify opportunities to improve our returns, as well as potential impacts of this review on our operations and financial results.
Toronto Real Property and Related Transactions Update:
Assuming the timely satisfaction of various conditions, we currently anticipate that the sale of our Toronto real property, which includes the site of our corporate headquarters and Toronto manufacturing operations, to close by the end of 2018, although further delays in the approval process could move the closing to early 2019. However, there can be no assurance that this transaction will be completed when anticipated, or at all. Any amounts we receive from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated, will be included in non-IFRS free cash flow in the period of receipt, and are expected to more than offset the building improvements and other capitalized costs, as well as transition costs, associated with our relocations and the preparation of our new facilities. See “Liquidity — Toronto Real Property and Related Transactions” below for a discussion of our anticipated Toronto property sale and related transactions, and transition and capital costs incurred in connection with the relocation of our Toronto manufacturing operations and the anticipated relocation of our corporate headquarters.
Restructuring Update:
7
As previously disclosed, we are implementing various restructuring actions under a cost efficiency initiative. We have recorded $23.7 million in restructuring charges from the commencement of this initiative through the end of the second quarter of 2018, including the $8.8 million of restructuring charges recorded in the second quarter of 2018. We currently estimate that we will incur aggregate restructuring charges of between $50.0 million and $75.0 million under this initiative, and that most of the charges will be recorded in the second half of 2018 through mid-2019. We anticipate that this initiative, combined with benefits from anticipated increases in ATS segment revenue, will result in improved non-IFRS operating margin by the end of the second half of 2018.
Share Repurchase Plan:
Since the commencement in November 2017 of our current NCIB (2017 NCIB) through June 30, 2018, we paid $58.2 million (including transaction fees) to repurchase and cancel 5.5 million subordinate voting shares. The maximum number of subordinate voting shares that we are permitted to repurchase for cancellation under the 2017 NCIB is reduced by the number of subordinate voting shares we purchase in the open market during the term of the 2017 NCIB to satisfy delivery obligations under our stock-based compensation plans (1.1 million subordinate voting shares purchased for such purpose from commencement through June 30, 2018). As of June 30, 2018, up to approximately 3.9 million additional subordinate voting shares may be purchased under the 2017 NCIB for cancellation and to satisfy delivery obligations under stock-based compensation plans.
Solar Exit Update:
During the second quarter of 2018, we completed the sale of our remaining solar panel manufacturing equipment. As of June 30, 2018, we had $3.7 million of outstanding solar accounts receivable, all from one former solar supplier, $1.0 million of which was repaid in July 2018, with the remainder expected by the end of the third quarter of 2018. If we are unable to recover the outstanding amounts owed to us, we will incur additional asset write-downs in future periods.
Summary of Q2 2018
Our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and accounting policies we adopted in accordance with IFRS. The Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly our financial position as at June 30, 2018 and the financial performance, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. We have restated the comparative reporting periods presented herein (other than 2016 quarterly periods) to reflect the adoption of IFRS 15, effective January 1, 2018, as well as our current segment structure. No restatements were required as a result of our adoption of IFRS 9 as of January 1, 2018.
The following table sets forth certain key operating results and financial information for the periods indicated (in millions, except per share amounts and percentages):
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | % change | 2017 | 2018 | % change | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 1,557.6 | $ | 1,695.2 | 9 | % | $ | 3,039.7 | $ | 3,194.9 | 5 | % | |||||||
Gross profit | 108.8 | 104.8 | (4 | )% | 211.3 | 198.3 | (6 | )% | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) | 50.4 | 52.7 | 5 | % | 104.1 | 105.0 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Other charges (recoveries) | 8.0 | 15.8 | 98 | % | 15.6 | 26.3 | 69 | % | |||||||||||
Net earnings | 34.6 | 16.1 | (53 | )% | 57.1 | 30.2 | (47 | )% | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.11 | (54 | )% | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.21 | (46 | )% | |||||||
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||
Segment revenue* as a percentage of total revenue: | June 30 | June 30 | |||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||
ATS revenue (% of total revenue) | 31% | 33% | 32 | % | 34 | % | |||
CCS revenue (% of total revenue) | 69% | 67% | 68 | % | 66 | % | |||
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Segment income and segment margin*: | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||
Segment Margin | Segment Margin | Segment Margin | Segment Margin | ||||||||||||||||||
ATS segment | $ | 22.5 | 4.7% | $ | 28.2 | 5.1% | $ | 45.8 | 4.7 | % | $ | 56.1 | 5.2 | % | |||||||
CCS segment | 35.7 | 3.3% | 24.9 | 2.2% | 65.6 | 3.2 | % | 41.7 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||
* Segment performance is evaluated based on segment revenue, segment income and segment margin (segment income as a percentage of segment revenue), each of which are defined in “Operating Results - Segment income and margin” below.
8
December 31 2017 | June 30 2018 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 515.2 | $ | 401.4 | ||||
Total assets | 2,964.2 | 3,212.2 | ||||||
Borrowings under applicable term loan | 187.5 | 350.0 | ||||||
Borrowings under applicable revolving credit facility | — | — | ||||||
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 55.2 | $ | (14.9 | ) | $ | 90.8 | $ | (20.3 | ) | |||||
Share repurchased for cancellation — aggregate price | — | 3.2 | — | 38.3 | |||||||||||
— # (in millions) | — | 0.3 | — | 3.6 | |||||||||||
Share repurchases for delivery under stock-based plans — aggregate price | 5.2 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 9.6 | |||||||||||
— # (in millions) | 0.37 | 0.4 | 0.46 | 0.8 | |||||||||||
A discussion of the foregoing results is set forth under “Operating Results” below.
Other performance indicators:
In addition to the key operating results and financial information described above, management reviews the following measures (which are not measures defined under IFRS):
1Q17 | 2Q17 | 3Q17 | 4Q17 | 1Q18 | 2Q18 | |||||||
Cash cycle days: | ||||||||||||
Days in A/R | 61 | 57 | 58 | 58 | 62 | 57 | ||||||
Days in inventory | 47 | 47 | 50 | 51 | 57 | 56 | ||||||
Days in A/P | (58) | (56) | (56) | (56) | (62) | (60 | ) | |||||
Cash cycle days | 50 | 48 | 52 | 53 | 57 | 53 | ||||||
Inventory turns | 7.8x | 7.7x | 7.3x | 7.2x | 6.4x | 6.6x | ||||||
2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | March 31 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||
A/R Sales (in millions) | $ | 50.0 | $ | 50.0 | $ | 50.0 | $ | 80.0 | $ | 113.0 | $ | 113.0 | |||||||
Supplier Financing* (in millions) | 44.5 | 65.4 | 55.1 | 52.3 | 77.8 | 76.0 | |||||||||||||
Total (in millions) | $ | 94.5 | $ | 115.4 | $ | 105.1 | $ | 132.3 | $ | 190.8 | $ | 189.0 | |||||||
* Represents A/R sold to a third party bank in connection with a customer's uncommitted supplier financing program that we joined in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Days in A/R is calculated as the average A/R for the quarter divided by the average daily revenue. Days in inventory is calculated as the average inventory for the quarter divided by the average daily cost of sales. Days in accounts payable (A/P) is calculated as the average A/P for the quarter divided by average daily cost of sales. Cash cycle days is calculated as the sum of days in A/R and days in inventory, minus the days in A/P. Inventory turns is calculated as 365 divided by the number of days in inventory. A lower number of days in A/R, days in inventory, and cash cycle days, and a higher number of days in A/P and inventory turns generally reflect improved cash management performance.
We believe that cash cycle days (and the components thereof) and inventory turns are useful measures in providing investors with information regarding our cash management performance and are accepted measures of working capital management efficiency in our industry. These are not measures of performance under IFRS, and may not be defined and calculated in the same
9
manner by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to working capital as an indicator of performance.
Management also reviews other non-IFRS measures including adjusted net earnings, operating margin, adjusted ROIC and free cash flow. See “Non-IFRS measures” below.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Our assessment of these factors forms the basis for our judgments on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and assumptions. We review our estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis and make revisions as determined necessary by management. Revisions are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and may impact future periods as well. Significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are described in note 2 to our 2017 AFS. The following identifies those accounting policies which management considers to be “critical,” defined as accounting policies that management believes are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. On January 1, 2018, we adopted IFRS 9 and IFRS 15. As a result, we have modified the significant accounting policies set forth in notes 2(q), (r), (s) and (t) to our 2017 AFS, and our critical accounting policies set forth under “Financial assets and financial liabilities” in Item 5 of our 2017 20-F. See notes 2 and 3 to our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements for a description of our adoption of these standards, and related changes to our accounting policies. Other than the foregoing changes in accounting policies, there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates during the first half of 2018, as discussed in Item 5 of our 2017 20-F.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty and judgment: We have applied significant estimates and assumptions in the following areas which we believe could have a significant impact on our reported results and financial position: our valuations of inventory, assets held for sale and income taxes; the amount of our restructuring charges or recoveries; the measurement of the recoverable amounts of our cash generating units (CGUs, as defined below), which includes estimating future growth, profitability, discount and terminal growth rates, and the fair value of our real property; our valuations of financial assets and liabilities, pension and non-pension post-employment benefit costs, employee stock-based compensation expense, provisions and contingencies; and the allocation of the purchase price and other valuations related to our business acquisitions.
We define a CGU as the smallest identifiable group of assets that cannot be tested individually and that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. CGUs can be comprised of a single site, a group of sites, or a line of business.
We have also applied significant judgment in the following areas: the determination of our CGUs and whether events or changes in circumstances during the relevant period are indicators that a review for impairment should be conducted, and the timing of the recognition of charges or recoveries associated with our restructuring actions. The near-term economic environment could also impact certain estimates necessary to prepare our consolidated financial statements, including the estimates related to the recoverable amounts used in our impairment testing of our non-financial assets (see note 16(b) to our 2017 AFS), and the discount rates applied to our net pension and non-pension post-employment benefit assets or liabilities (see note 19 to our 2017 AFS). We did not identify any triggering event during the second quarter of 2018 that would indicate the carrying amount of our assets or CGUs may not be recoverable.
See notes 2 and 3 to the Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements for a discussion of the adoption and impact of recently adopted accounting standards, as well as recently issued accounting pronouncements.
10
Operating Results
Our annual and quarterly operating results are affected by, among other factors: the level and timing of customer orders; our mix of customers and the types of products or services we provide; the rate at which, the costs associated with, and the execution of, new program ramps; volumes and the seasonality of our business; price competition and other competitive factors; the mix of manufacturing or service value-add; capacity utilization; manufacturing efficiency; the degree of automation used in the assembly process; the availability of components or labor; the timing of receiving components and materials; costs and inefficiencies of transferring programs between sites; program completions or losses, or customer disengagements and the timing and the margin of any replacement business; the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations; the performance of third-party providers; our ability to manage inventory, production location and equipment effectively; our ability to manage changing labor, component, energy and transportation costs effectively; fluctuations in variable compensation costs; the timing of our expenditures in anticipation of forecasted sales levels; and the timing of any acquisitions and related integration costs. Our operations may also be affected by natural disasters or other local risks present in the jurisdictions in which we, our suppliers, logistics partners, and/or our customers operate. These events could lead to higher costs or supply shortages or may disrupt the delivery of components to us or our ability to provide finished products or services to our customers, any of which could adversely affect our operating results.
In addition, customer or program transfers between EMS providers are part of the competitive nature of our industry. Customers may choose to change the allocation of demand among their EMS providers and/or may shift programs from one region to another region within an EMS provider’s global network. Customers may also decide to insource production they had previously outsourced to utilize their internal capacity or for other reasons. As a result, our operating results for each period include the impacts associated with new program wins, follow-on business, program completions or losses, as well as any acquisitions. The volume, profitability and the location of new business awards vary from period-to-period and from program-to-program. Significant period-to-period variations can also result from the timing of new programs reaching full production or programs reaching end-of-life, the timing of follow-on or next generation programs and/or the timing of existing programs being fully or partially transferred internally or to a competitor.
See “Overview — Overview of business environment” above for a discussion of recently-imposed tariffs and countermeasures, supply constraints with respect to certain electronic components, and potential impacts of the foregoing on our business.
Operating results expressed as a percentage of revenue:
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||
Revenue | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||
Cost of sales | 93.0 | 93.8 | 93.0 | 93.8 | |||||||
Gross profit | 7.0 | 6.2 | 7.0 | 6.2 | |||||||
SG&A | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.3 | |||||||
Research and development costs | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||
Other charges | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | |||||||
Finance costs | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||||||
Earnings before income tax | 2.5 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.2 | |||||||
Income tax expense | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | |||||||
Net earnings | 2.2 | % | 0.9 | % | 1.9 | % | 0.9 | % | |||
11
Revenue:
Aggregate revenue of $1.70 billion for the second quarter of 2018 increased 9% compared to the same period in 2017. Aggregate revenue of $3.19 billion for the first half of 2018 increased 5% compared to the same period in 2017.
The following table sets forth revenue from our reportable segments as a percentage of our total revenue for the periods indicated (in millions, except percentages):
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
ATS revenue | $ | 478.5 | 31% | $ | 553.2 | 33% | $ | 969.9 | 32% | $ | 1,086.0 | 34% | |||||||||||
CCS revenue | 1,079.1 | 69% | 1,142.0 | 67% | 2,069.8 | 68% | 2,108.9 | 66% | |||||||||||||||
Communications | 44 | % | 42 | % | 44 | % | 41 | % | |||||||||||||||
Enterprise | 25 | % | 25 | % | 24 | % | 25 | % | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 1,557.6 | $ | 1,695.2 | $ | 3,039.7 | $ | 3,194.9 | |||||||||||||||
Our product and service volumes, revenue and operating results vary from period to period depending on various factors, as discussed above. In addition, we expect that the pace of technological change, the frequency of customers’ transferring business among EMS competitors or customers changing the volumes they outsource, and the dynamics of the global economy will continue to impact our business from period-to-period. See “Overview” above.
From time to time, we experience some level of seasonality in our quarterly revenue patterns across some of our businesses. However, the numerous factors described above that affect our period-to-period results make it difficult to isolate the impact of seasonality and other external factors on our business. In the past, revenue from the storage component of our CCS segment has increased in the fourth quarter of the year compared to the third quarter, and then decreased in the first quarter of the following year, reflecting the increase in customer demand we typically experience in this business in the fourth quarter. In addition, we typically experience our lowest overall revenue levels during the first quarter of each year. There is no assurance that these patterns will continue.
Our ATS segment represented 33% of total revenue for the second quarter of 2018, up from 31% of total revenue for the second quarter of 2017, and 34% of total revenue for the first half of 2018, up from 32% of total revenue for the first half of 2017. Revenue dollars from our ATS segment for the second quarter and first half of 2018 increased $74.7 million (16%) and $116.1 million (12%), respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017, reflecting new aerospace and defense programs, including from our acquisition of Atrenne and our September 2017 “operate-in-place” program, as well as strong demand in our semiconductor business. ATS segment revenue for the second quarter and first half of 2018 was adversely impacted by a $4 million and $15 million decrease in revenue from the prior year periods, respectively, due to our exit from the solar panel manufacturing business, which accounted for an approximate 5% and 13% impact from the prior year periods, respectively.
Our CCS segment represented 67% of total revenue for the second quarter of 2018, down from 69% of total revenue for the second quarter of 2017, and 66% of total revenue for the first half of 2018, down from 68% of total revenue for the first half of 2017. Revenue dollars from our CCS segment in the second quarter and first half of 2018 increased $62.9 million (6%) and $39.1 million (2%), respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. Revenue dollars from our Communications end market increased 2% compared to the second quarter of 2017, as increased demand and new programs (including JDM programs) were partially offset by demand softness from certain of our legacy customers. Revenue dollars from our Communications end market decreased 2% in the first half of 2018 compared to the first half of 2017, primarily due to a strong first half of 2017 and lower program specific demand from certain customers in the first half of 2018. Revenue dollars from our Enterprise end market in the second quarter and first half of 2018 increased 12% and 9%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017, primarily driven by growth (including in fulfillment services) in our storage business. The increase in revenue dollars in our Enterprise end market for the first half of 2018 more than offset the decline in our Communications end market for such period as compared to the prior year period. We continued to be impacted by adverse pricing pressures in our CCS segment in the second quarter of 2018 and expect these adverse conditions to continue in future periods. See “Overview — Recent developments” above.
For the second quarter and first half of 2018, we had one customer (in our CCS segment) that represented more than 10% of total revenue (second quarter and first half of 2017 — two customers (each in our CCS segment)).
12
Although we supply products and services to over 100 customers, we depend upon a small number of customers for a substantial portion of our revenue. In the aggregate, our top 10 customers represented 71% of total revenue for each of the second quarter and first half of 2018 (second quarter of 2017 — 71%; first half of 2017 — 70%). We are dependent to a significant degree upon continued revenue from our largest customers. We generally enter into master supply agreements with our customers that provide the framework for our overall relationship. These agreements typically do not guarantee a particular level of business or fixed pricing. Instead, we bid on a program-by-program basis and typically receive customer purchase orders for specific quantities and timing of products. There can be no assurance that revenue from any of our major customers will continue at historical levels or will not decrease in absolute terms or as a percentage of total revenue. A significant revenue decrease or pricing pressures from these or other customers, or a loss of a major customer or program, could have a material adverse impact on our business, our operating results and our financial position. Changes in the types of product or services we provide to our customers in a particular period may also adversely impact our margins and operating results for such period. For example, providing a relatively higher concentration of fulfillment services (which commenced in 2017 and is expected to continue) negatively impacts our operating results for our CCS segment, as these fulfillment services generally have significantly lower margins than our traditional value-added services in that segment. Some of our customer agreements require us to provide specific price reductions to our customers over the term of the contracts, which has significantly impacted revenue and margins in our CCS segment. Our margins and operating results will be negatively impacted to the extent we cannot compensate for such reductions. In addition, as longer-term contracts are becoming more prevalent, we anticipate that these adverse effects will increasingly impact our business in future periods.
In the EMS industry, customers may cancel contracts and volume levels can be changed or delayed. Customers may also shift business to a competitor or bring programs in-house to improve their own utilization, to adjust the concentration of their supplier base to manage supply continuity risk, or for other reasons. We cannot assure the replacement of completed, delayed, cancelled or reduced orders with new business. In addition, we cannot assure that any of our current customers will continue to utilize our services. Changes in demand, order cancellations, and changes or delays in production could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and working capital performance, including requiring us to carry higher than expected levels of inventory. Materials constraints, primarily impacting our CCS segment (which commenced in 2017 and are expected to continue) can also cause delays in production and could have a material adverse impact on our operations and our inventory levels. In addition, in any given quarter, including in the second quarter, we can experience quality and process variances related to materials, testing or other manufacturing or supply chain activities. Although we are successful in resolving the majority of these issues, the existence of these variances could have a material adverse impact on the demand for our services in future periods from any affected customers, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Order cancellations and delays could also lower our asset utilization, resulting in lower margins. Significant period-to-period changes in margins can also result if new program wins or follow-on business are more competitively priced than past programs. In addition, customers from time to time shift programs to us from other service providers, including some for lower complexity, light touch programs that are aggressively priced, which can adversely impact future operating results.
Gross profit:
The following table shows gross profit and gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of total revenue) for the periods indicated:
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit (in millions) | $ | 108.8 | $ | 104.8 | $ | 211.3 | $ | 198.3 | |||||||
Gross margin | 7.0 | % | 6.2 | % | 7.0 | % | 6.2 | % | |||||||
Gross profit for the second quarter of 2018 decreased by 4% to $104.8 million compared to the same period in 2017. Gross margin for the second quarter of 2018 decreased from 7.0% in the prior year period to 6.2%. The decrease in gross profit and gross margin resulted primarily from unfavorable changes in overall program mix and increased pricing pressures primarily in our CCS segment, $8.1 million in additional provisions we recorded for certain aged inventory in the second quarter of 2018 (Inventory Provision), and the $1.6 million Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment (Atrenne FVA). These impacts more than offset the increases in gross profit for the second quarter of 2018 as compared to the prior year period attributable to higher revenue levels and margin improvements in our ATS segment, including as a result of new programs and revenue attributable to Atrenne. Gross profit for the first half of 2018 decreased by 6% to $198.3 million compared to the same period in 2017. Gross margin for the first half of 2018 decreased from 7.0% in the prior year period to 6.2%. The decrease in gross profit and gross margin resulted
13
primarily from unfavorable changes in overall program mix (including a higher concentration of lower-margin fulfillment services in the 2018 period), increased pricing pressures primarily in our CCS segment, the Inventory Provision, and the Atrenne FVA, which more than offset the increases in gross profit for the first half of 2018 as compared to the prior year period attributable to higher revenue levels and margin improvements in our ATS segment, including as a result of new programs and revenue attributable to Atrenne.
The Inventory Provision resulted primarily from an increase in our aged inventory levels (in both of our segments), approximately three-quarters of which related to customers in our CCS segment. We recorded the Atrenne FVA in connection with our purchase of Atrenne, to write-up the value of the acquired inventory. Our gross profit for the second quarter and first half of 2018 was negatively impacted as a result of the recognition of the full $1.6 million adjustment in costs of sales for the second quarter of 2018, as such acquired inventory was sold during the quarter. As part of the wind down of our solar panel business, we recorded an inventory provision of $0.9 million during the second quarter of 2017 to write down our then-remaining solar panel inventory to recoverable amounts.
In general, multiple factors cause gross margin to fluctuate including, among others: volume and mix of products or services; higher/lower revenue concentration in lower gross margin products and businesses; pricing pressures; contract terms and conditions; production inefficiencies; utilization of manufacturing capacity; changing material and labor costs, including variable labor costs associated with direct manufacturing employees; manufacturing and transportation costs; start-up and ramp-up activities; new product introductions; disruption in production at individual sites, including as a result of program transfers; cost structures at individual sites; foreign exchange volatility; and the availability of components and materials. Our gross profit and SG&A (discussed below) are also impacted by the level of variable compensation expense (including in connection with cash and equity awards under our compensation plans) we record in each period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
SG&A for the second quarter of 2018 of $52.7 million (3.1% of total revenue) increased $2.3 million compared to $50.4 million (3.2% of total revenue) for the same period in 2017. SG&A for the first half of 2018 of $105.0 million (3.3% of total revenue) increased $0.9 million compared to $104.1 million (3.4% of total revenue) for the same period in 2017. These increases were primarily due to higher employee stock-based compensation expense in the 2018 periods (described below), as well as SG&A attributable to Atrenne's operations, recorded for the first time in the second quarter of 2018. These increases were partially offset by $1.5 million in foreign exchange gains recorded in the second quarter of 2018. As part of the wind down of our solar panel manufacturing business, we recorded a provision of $0.5 million in SG&A expenses during the second quarter of 2017 to write down our then-outstanding solar accounts receivable.
Segment income and margin:
Segment performance is evaluated based on segment revenue (set forth above), segment income and segment margin (segment income as a percentage of segment revenue). Revenue is attributed to the segment in which the product is manufactured or the service is performed. Segment income is defined as a segment’s net revenue less its cost of sales and its allocable portion of selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses (collectively, Segment Costs). Identifiable Segment Costs are allocated directly to the applicable segment while other Segment Costs, including indirect costs and certain corporate charges, are allocated to our segments based on an analysis of the relative usage or benefit derived by each segment from such costs. Segment income excludes finance costs, amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software), employee stock-based compensation expense, other solar charges, the $1.6 million Atrenne FVA, and net restructuring, impairment and other charges (recoveries) (each of which exclusions is quantified herein) as these costs and charges are managed and reviewed by our CEO at the company level. Net restructuring, impairment and other charges (recoveries) include, in applicable periods, restructuring charges (recoveries), impairment charges (recoveries), acquisition-related consulting, transaction and integration costs, legal settlements (recoveries), Toronto transition costs (recoveries), and the accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs (as described under “Non-IFRS measures” below). See the reconciliation of segment income to our earnings before income taxes in note 4 to the Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements. Our segments do not record inter-segment revenue. Although segment income and segment margin are used to evaluate the performance of our segments, we may incur operating costs in one segment that may also benefit the other segment. Our accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as those applied to the company as a whole.
14
The following table shows segment income (in millions) and segment margin for the periods indicated:
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment Margin | Segment Margin | Segment Margin | Segment Margin | ||||||||||||||||||
ATS segment income and margin | $ | 22.5 | 4.7% | $ | 28.2 | 5.1% | $ | 45.8 | 4.7 | % | $ | 56.1 | 5.2 | % | |||||||
CCS segment income and margin | 35.7 | 3.3% | 24.9 | 2.2% | 65.6 | 3.2 | % | 41.7 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||
ATS segment income for the second quarter and first half of 2018 increased $5.7 million (25%) and $10.3 million (22%), respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. ATS segment margin for the second quarter and first half of 2018 increased from 4.7% to 5.1%, and from 4.7% to 5.2%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. The increases in ATS segment income and margin for the second quarter and first half of 2018 were primarily due to the higher ATS segment revenue in the 2018 periods described above, resulting most significantly from our September 2017 “operate-in-place” aerospace and defense program, revenue attributable to Atrenne, and higher revenue in our semiconductor business.
CCS segment income for the second quarter and first half of 2018 decreased $10.8 million (30%) and $23.9 million (36%), respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. CCS segment margin for the second quarter and first half of 2018 decreased from 3.3% to 2.2%, and from 3.2% to 2.0%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. Despite the increase in our overall CCS segment revenue for the second quarter and first half of 2018, CCS segment income and margin for these same periods as compared to the prior year periods were negatively impacted by increased pricing pressures from some of our significant customers, unfavorable changes in program mix, including a higher concentration of lower margin business compared to the prior year periods (particularly in the first quarter of 2018), and the Inventory Provision recorded in the second quarter of 2018 (discussed above). These decreases were partially offset by CCS segment income contributions from our JDM business in both the second quarter and the first half of 2018 as compared to the prior year periods. The performance of our CCS segment in recent periods resulted in the implementation of our cost efficiency initiative (and related restructuring actions) in order to reduce our cost structure (see “Other charges” below). In addition, as part of our strategy to diversify our business and improve overall shareholder returns, we are undertaking a comprehensive review of our CCS business, with the intention of addressing under-performing programs. This review could ultimately result in our disengagement from certain customer programs if we determine that financial returns from such programs are not anticipated to contribute to improved consistency in our revenues and operating margins for such segment. This could in turn result in corresponding declines in our CCS segment revenue, changes to our manufacturing network, and/or additional restructuring actions. We also intend to continue to invest in areas we believe are key to the long-term success of our CCS segment, including our JDM offering, to help drive improved CCS financial performance in future periods.
Stock-based compensation:
Our employee stock-based compensation expense, which excludes Director Share Units (DSU) expense, varies each period. The portion of our expense that relates to performance-based compensation generally varies depending on our level of achievement of pre-determined performance goals and financial targets. The following table shows employee stock-based compensation expense for the periods indicated (in millions):
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Employee stock-based compensation expense in cost of sales | $ | 3.4 | $ | 2.8 | $ | 8.5 | $ | 7.9 | |||||||
Employee stock-based compensation expense in SG&A | 2.3 | 4.4 | 8.2 | 9.7 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 5.7 | $ | 7.2 | $ | 16.7 | $ | 17.6 | |||||||
15
Compared to the second quarter and first half of 2017, our employee stock-based compensation expense for the second quarter and first half of 2018 increased by $1.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, reflecting higher reversals we recorded primarily in the second quarter of 2017 in connection with forfeited awards. Our employee stock based compensation expense for the second quarter and first half of 2018 benefited from $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in lower accelerated recognition of stock-based compensation expense for employees eligible for retirement as compared to the same periods in 2017.
In the second quarter and first half of 2018, we also recorded DSU expense of $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively) through SG&A.
Other charges:
We have recorded the following restructuring and other charges for the periods indicated (in millions):
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Restructuring charges | $ | 5.8 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 11.6 | $ | 15.7 | |||||
Loss on pension annuity purchase | 1.9 | — | 1.9 | — | |||||||||
Toronto transition costs | — | 3.5 | — | 5.2 | |||||||||
Accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs | — | 1.2 | — | 1.2 | |||||||||
Other | 0.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 4.2 | |||||||||
$ | 8.0 | $ | 15.8 | $ | 15.6 | $ | 26.3 | ||||||
Restructuring:
We perform ongoing evaluations of our business, operational efficiency and cost structure, and implement restructuring actions as we deem necessary. We are currently implementing restructuring actions under a cost efficiency initiative. Such initiative will include reductions to our workforce, as well as the potential consolidation of certain sites to better align capacity and infrastructure with current and anticipated customer demand, related transfers of customer programs and production, re-alignment of business processes, management reorganizations, and other associated activities. We currently estimate that we will incur aggregate restructuring charges of between $50.0 million and $75.0 million with respect to our cost efficiency initiative, which will consist primarily of cash charges. We have recorded $23.7 million in restructuring charges from the commencement of our cost efficiency initiative through the end of the second quarter of 2018, including the $8.8 million and $15.7 million of restructuring charges recorded in the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively. We currently expect most of the restructuring charges under this initiative will be recorded in the second half of 2018 through mid-2019. We anticipate that a majority of these restructuring actions will pertain to our CCS segment sites in future periods.
We recorded restructuring charges of $8.8 million during the second quarter of 2018, consisting of cash charges of $8.9 million, primarily for consultant costs and employee termination costs, offset in part by a non-cash recovery of $0.1 million, representing gains on the sale of surplus equipment. We recorded restructuring charges of $15.7 million during the first half of 2018, consisting of cash charges of $15.5 million, primarily for consultant costs and employee termination costs, and non-cash charges of $0.2 million, representing losses on the sale of surplus equipment. We recorded restructuring charges of $5.8 million and $11.6 million during the second quarter and first half of 2017, respectively, consisting of cash charges of $0.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively, primarily for employee termination costs resulting from the implementation of our previously completed Organizational Design and Global Business Services initiatives, and non-cash charges of $5.2 million for the second quarter and first half of 2017, to further write down the carrying value of our solar panel manufacturing equipment, which we have since sold. Our restructuring provision at June 30, 2018 was $12.4 million (December 31, 2017 — $12.7 million), which we currently expect to pay in 2018. All cash outlays have been, and the balance is expected to be, funded with cash on hand.
We may also propose additional future restructuring actions or divestitures as a result of changes in our business, the marketplace and/or our exit from less profitable, under-performing, non-core or non-strategic operations. See “Overview — Celestica's business” above for a discussion of a comprehensive review of our CCS business we are undertaking to address under-performing programs and potential impacts of this review, which may include additional restructuring actions. In addition, an increase in the frequency of customers transferring business to our EMS competitors, changes in the volumes they outsource,
16
pricing pressures, or requests to transfer their programs among our sites or to lower-cost locations, may also result in our taking future restructuring actions. We may incur higher operating expenses during periods of transitioning programs within our network or to our competitors. Any such restructuring activities, if undertaken at all, could adversely impact our operating and financial results, and may require us to further adjust our operations.
The recognition of restructuring charges requires us to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the nature, timing and amounts associated with our restructuring actions. See note 2(m) to our 2017 AFS.
Pension annuity purchases:
In March 2017, the Trustees of our U.K. Main pension plan entered into an agreement with a third party insurance company to purchase an annuity for participants of such plan who have retired. The cost of the annuity was £123.7 million (approximately $154.3 million at the exchange rate at the time of recording) and was funded with existing plan assets. The annuity is held as an asset of the U.K. Main pension plan. Although we retain ultimate responsibility for the payment of benefits to plan participants, the annuity substantially hedges the financial risk component of the associated pension obligations for such retired participants. The purchase of the annuity resulted in a non-cash loss of $17.0 million which we recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) and simultaneously re-classified to deficit during the first quarter of 2017. We also reduced the value of our pension assets by $17.0 million during the first quarter of 2017, which was recorded in other non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet. A true-up adjustment on the cost of this annuity is expected to be finalized in the third quarter of 2018, and we may be required to pay additional premium amounts to the insurance company in such period after completion of data verification of all retired participants.
In April 2017, the Trustees of our U.K Supplementary pension plan entered into an agreement with a third party insurance company to purchase an annuity for all participants of this plan, all of whom are retired. The cost of the annuity was £9.1 million (approximately $11.7 million at the exchange rate at the time of recording) and was funded with existing plan assets. The annuity is held as an asset of such plan. For the U.K. Supplementary pension plan, we anticipate transferring the pension annuity to individual plan members and winding up the plan in 2018. Although we retain ultimate responsibility for the payment of benefits to plan participants until such wind-up is complete, the annuity substantially hedges the financial risk component of the associated pension obligations for such retired participants. The purchase of the annuity resulted in a non-cash loss of $1.9 million which we recorded in the second quarter of 2017 in other charges in our consolidated statement of operations, with a corresponding reduction in the value of our pension assets which is recorded in other non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet.
In June 2018, the Trustees of the U.K. Main pension plan entered into an agreement with a third party insurance company to purchase an annuity for participants in such plan who have not yet retired. The cost of the annuity was £156.1 million (approximately $209.2 million at the exchange rate at the time of recording) and was funded with existing plan assets. The purchase of the annuity resulted in a non-cash loss of $63.3 million for the second quarter of 2018 which we recorded in OCI and simultaneously re-classified to deficit, and the recognition of an additional pension obligation on our consolidated balance sheet after we fully reduced the pension asset to zero. The cost of this annuity is subject to a true-up adjustment within the next 12 months, and we may be required to pay additional premium amounts to the insurance company after completion of data verification for such non-retired participants.
Toronto transition costs:
As previously disclosed, we will incur significant transition costs, which we will record in other charges, to relocate our Toronto manufacturing operations and our corporate headquarters. During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded $3.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — nil; fourth quarter of 2017 — $1.6 million) of such transition costs, consisting primarily of utility costs related to idle premises, depreciation charges and personnel costs used in the operation of duplicate production lines in advance of the transition, and relocation costs. The costs, timing, and execution of the relocation of our Toronto manufacturing operations and the anticipated relocation of our corporate headquarters could have a material adverse impact on our business, our operating results and our financial position, unless and until the sale of our Toronto real property is consummated and the full purchase price is received. See “Liquidity — Toronto Real Property and Related Transactions” below for a discussion of our anticipated Toronto real property sale and related relocations, including transition and capital costs incurred through June 30, 2018 and expected in connection therewith.
17
Accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs:
During the second quarter of 2018, we recorded a $1.2 million charge to accelerate the amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the extinguishment of the Prior Facility.
Other:
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded $2.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively for consulting, transaction and integration costs related to potential and completed acquisitions (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, related to the Karel acquisition). Additionally, during the first quarter of 2017, we recorded costs related to a prior legal matter.
Finance costs:
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded $4.9 million and $8.2 million of finance costs, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $2.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively). Finance costs are comprised primarily of interest expense and fees related to our credit facility, our A/R sales program, and a customer's supplier financing program. We incurred $2.3 million and $3.0 million in higher finance costs during the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods, in part due to $1.3 million interest expense in connection with additional borrowings in April 2018 under the Prior Revolver primarily to fund the Atrenne acquisition, as well as additional fees associated with the increased sale of A/R compared to the prior year periods, and higher interest expense on the Prior Term Loan due to increasing interest rates.
In connection with the New Credit Facility, we incurred debt issuance costs totaling $8.0 million during the second quarter of 2018, which have been deferred and will be amortized to finance costs over the term of the New Term Loan and New Revolver, as applicable. $7.0 million of such costs were paid in June 2018 (see “Liquidity — Cash provided by (used in) financing activities” below).
Income taxes:
For the second quarter of 2018, we had a net income tax expense of $4.8 million on earnings before tax of $20.9 million, compared to a net income tax expense of $4.4 million on earnings before tax of $39.0 million for the second quarter of 2017. For the first half of 2018, we had a net income tax expense of $10.1 million on earnings before tax of $40.3 million, compared to a net income tax expense of $12.4 million on earnings before tax of $69.5 million for the first half of 2017.
During the second quarter of 2018, we received a favorable conclusion to our application for a bi-lateral advance pricing arrangement (BAPA) between the United States and Mexican tax authorities. Accordingly, we reversed $6.0 million of Mexican income taxes previously accrued (Mexican Tax Reversal) to reflect the approved BAPA terms, which favorably impacted our net income tax expense for the second quarter of 2018. In addition, as a result of our Atrenne acquisition, we recognized $3.7 million of previously unrecognized deferred tax assets in our U.S. group of subsidiaries (Atrenne Benefit) in the second quarter of 2018, which partially offset the net deferred tax liabilities that arose in connection with such acquisition. These income tax benefits were offset in part by additional taxes due to an increased proportion of profits earned in taxable jurisdictions, and adverse taxable foreign exchange impacts arising from the weakening of the Malaysian ringgit, Chinese renminbi, and Thai baht relative to the U.S. dollar (our functional currency), each in the second quarter of 2018. Our net income tax expense for the first half of 2018 was favorably impacted by the Mexican Tax Reversal and the Atrenne Benefit, offset in part by additional taxes due to an increased proportion of profits earned in taxable jurisdictions. The net impact of taxable foreign exchange on our net income tax expense for the first half of 2018 was not significant.
Our net income tax expense for the second quarter and first half of 2017 consisted primarily of tax expense recorded in jurisdictions with current taxes expense payable and changes in temporary differences in various jurisdictions, offset in part by the favorable impact of deferred income tax benefit of $5.0 million related to the write-down and impairments we recorded for our solar assets in the second quarter of 2017 and prior quarters. In connection with our exit from the solar panel manufacturing business, we withdrew one of our tax incentives in Thailand (which related solely to such operations) during the second quarter of 2017. The withdrawal of this incentive allowed us to apply future tax losses arising from the ultimate disposition of our solar assets against other fully taxable profits in Thailand. The sale of the solar equipment was completed during the second quarter of 2018, and estimated tax losses were adjusted to account for actual net proceeds. The impact of taxable foreign exchange on our net income tax expense for the second quarter and first half of 2017 was not significant.
18
The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (U.S. Tax Reform) was enacted on December 22, 2017 and became effective January 1, 2018.We believe we have recorded all significant one-time impacts resulting from enactment of the U.S. Tax Reform in the fourth quarter of 2017 (consisting of a non-cash increase to our deferred income tax expense of $2.0 million), but will continue to assess additional impacts, if any, throughout 2018 as they become known due to changes in our interpretations and assumptions, as well as applicable changes in our business and additional regulatory guidance that may be issued. No significant amounts resulting from the U.S. Tax Reform were recorded in the first half of 2018. Based on currently available information, we estimate that the U.S. Tax Reform may have an annual adverse impact on our tax expense of approximately $2.0 million starting in 2019.
We have multiple income tax incentives in Thailand with varying exemption periods. These incentives initially allow for a 100% income tax exemption (including distribution taxes), which after eight years transition to a 50% income tax exemption for the next five years (excluding distribution taxes). Upon full expiry of each of the incentives, taxable profits associated with such expired tax incentives become fully taxable. As a result of our exit from the solar panel manufacturing business, we withdrew our tax incentive related to our solar panel manufacturing operations in Thailand during the second quarter of 2017. One of our remaining three Thailand tax incentives expires in 2019, another expires in 2020, and the third incentive will transition to the 50% exemption in 2022, and expire in 2027. Upon expiry of the first tax incentive in 2019, we estimate an additional annual tax expense of approximately $2.0 million based on current levels of profit. The withdrawal of the solar-related tax incentive in Thailand resulted in the recognition in 2017 of the deferred income tax benefit related to the write-downs and impairments of our solar assets in 2017 and 2016, as such withdrawal allowed future tax losses arising from the ultimate disposition of such assets to be applied against other fully taxable profits in Thailand. Our tax expense could increase significantly if certain tax incentives from which we benefit are retracted. See Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Operating Results — Income taxes” of our 2017 20-F for a discussion of general factors that impact our effective tax rate and the potential impact on our tax expense of the grant or retraction of tax incentives.
In certain jurisdictions, primarily in the Americas and Europe, we currently have significant net operating losses and other deductible temporary differences, which we expect will be used to reduce taxable income in these jurisdictions in future periods, although not all are currently recognized as deferred tax assets.
We develop our tax filing positions based upon the anticipated nature and structure of our business and the tax laws, administrative practices and judicial decisions currently in effect in the jurisdictions in which we have assets or conduct business, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. We are subject to tax audits of historical information by tax authorities in various jurisdictions which could result in additional tax expense in future periods relating to prior results. Reviews by tax authorities generally focus on, but are not limited to, the validity of our inter-company transactions, including financing and transfer pricing policies which generally involve subjective areas of taxation and a significant degree of judgment. Any such increase in our income tax expense and related interest and/or penalties could have a significant adverse impact on our future earnings and future cash flows.
In 2017, the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications (MCTIC) issued assessments seeking to disqualify certain amounts of research and development (R&D) expenses for the years 2006 to 2009, which entitled our Brazilian subsidiary (which ceased operations in 2009) to charge reduced sales tax levies to its customers. The assessments against our Brazilian subsidiary (including interest and penalties) total approximately 39 million Brazilian real (approximately $10 million at quarter-end exchange rates) for such years. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, we believe that our R&D activities for the period are supportable, and it is probable that our position will be sustained upon full examination by the appropriate Brazilian authorities and, if necessary, upon consideration by the Brazilian judicial courts. Our position is supported by our Brazilian legal advisers.
The successful pursuit of assertions made by any taxing authority could result in our owing significant amounts of tax, interest and possibly penalties. We believe we adequately accrue for any probable potential adverse tax ruling. However, there can be no assurance as to the final resolution of any claims and any resulting proceedings. If any claims and any ensuing proceedings are determined adversely to us, the amounts we may be required to pay could be material, and could be in excess of amounts accrued.
Net earnings:
Net earnings for the second quarter of 2018 of $16.1 million decreased $18.5 million compared to the second quarter of 2017. Net earnings for the first half of 2018 of $30.2 million decreased $26.9 million compared to the same period in 2017. These
19
decreases were primarily due to the lower gross profit and higher restructuring, acquisition-related and Toronto transition charges recorded in the second quarter and first half of 2018 as compared to the prior year periods, all as discussed above.
Recent Acquisitions and Program Transfer:
In November 2016, we acquired the business assets of Karel. The Karel acquisition supported our strategy to accelerate our growth in the aerospace and defense market through the addition of value-add capabilities and services. In April 2018, we completed the acquisition of U.S.-based Atrenne (see “Overview — Recent developments” above). Both acquisitions pertain to our ATS segment.
In September 2017, one of our existing aerospace and defense customers outsourced certain operations to us under a 10-year “operate-in-place” agreement, pursuant to which we provide manufacturing and after-market repair services for electromechanical and electronic assemblies across a wide array of technologies at such customers' site. This agreement further expanded our relationship with this customer, enhanced our ability to provide end-to-end product lifecycle solutions to our customers, and supported our strategy of growing our aerospace and defense business.
We may, at any time, be engaged in ongoing discussions with respect to possible acquisitions or strategic transactions that could expand our revenue base and/or service offerings, increase our penetration in various industries, establish strategic relationships with new or existing customers, enhance our competitiveness, and/or enhance our global supply chain network. There can be no assurance that any of these discussions will result in a definitive agreement and, if they do, what the terms or timing of any such agreement would be. There can also be no assurance that any acquisition or other strategic transaction will be successfully integrated or will generate the returns we expect. We may fund our acquisitions and other strategic transactions from cash on hand, third-party borrowings, the issuance of securities, or a combination thereof.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
The following tables set forth key liquidity metrics for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31 | June 30 | ||||||
2017 | 2018 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 515.2 | $ | 401.4 | |||
Borrowings under applicable credit facility | 187.5 | 350.0 | |||||
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 55.2 | $ | (14.9 | ) | $ | 90.8 | $ | (20.3 | ) | |||||
Cash used in investing activities | (18.4 | ) | (166.8 | ) | (36.5 | ) | (180.5 | ) | |||||||
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (12.1 | ) | 147.4 | (28.8 | ) | 87.0 | |||||||||
Changes in non-cash working capital items (included in operating activities above): | |||||||||||||||
A/R | $ | (5.4 | ) | $ | (104.8 | ) | $ | 47.9 | $ | (86.4 | ) | ||||
Inventories | (21.1 | ) | (65.3 | ) | (74.0 | ) | (170.1 | ) | |||||||
Other current assets | 21.3 | (6.2 | ) | 12.9 | (9.6 | ) | |||||||||
A/P, accrued and other current liabilities and provisions | (1.5 | ) | 121.4 | (11.9 | ) | 166.6 | |||||||||
Working capital changes | $ | (6.7 | ) | $ | (54.9 | ) | $ | (25.1 | ) | $ | (99.5 | ) | |||
20
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
In the second quarter of 2018, we used $14.9 million of cash for operating activities compared to $55.2 million of cash generated from operating activities in the second quarter of 2017. For the first half of 2018, we used $20.3 million of cash for operating activities compared to $90.8 million of cash generated from operating activities in the first half of 2017. These decreases were primarily due to $48.2 million and $74.4 million in higher working capital requirements in the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively, and $18.5 million and $26.9 million in lower net earnings in the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods. Higher working capital requirements for the second quarter and first half of 2018 as compared to the prior year periods were driven by increases in our inventory levels of $65.3 million and $170.1 million, respectively, and increases in A/R of $104.8 million and $86.4 million, respectively, partially offset by $121.4 million and $166.6 million in higher accounts payable for the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively. Although part of the additional inventory in the 2018 periods was required to support new program ramps, we experienced demand reductions from certain of our customers in each of our segments, as well as materials constraints primarily from CCS segment suppliers, during the second quarter and first half of 2018, each of which resulted in us carrying higher than expected levels of inventory at June 30, 2018. We anticipate that these adverse market conditions will continue to impact us in the near term. The increases in A/R for the second quarter and first half of 2018 as compared to the prior year periods generally reflect the higher amounts and timing of revenue earned during the second quarter and first half of 2018. The increase in accounts payable reflects the higher amount of inventory purchases during the 2018 periods.
From time to time, we extend payment terms applicable to certain customers, and/or provide longer payment terms to new customers or with respect to new programs. If this becomes more prevalent, it could adversely impact our working capital requirements, and increase our financial exposure and credit risk. Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2016, the payment terms of one of our significant customers was extended. In connection therewith, we registered for that customer's supplier financing program pursuant to which participating suppliers may sell A/R from such customer to a third-party bank on an uncommitted basis in order to receive earlier payment. At June 30, 2018, we sold $76.0 million of A/R under this program (June 30, 2017 — $65.4 million; December 31, 2017 — $52.3 million). We utilized this program to substantially offset the effect of the extended payment terms on our working capital for the period. We pay discount charges with respect to this arrangement, which we record as finance costs in our consolidated statement of operations.
Free cash flow (non-IFRS):
Our non-IFRS free cash flow (defined below) for the second quarter and first half of 2018 was negative $53.0 million and negative $87.1 million, respectively, compared to positive $32.8 million and positive $46.3 million for the second quarter and first half of 2017, respectively. The decrease in non-IFRS free cash flow in the second quarter and first half of 2018 was primarily due to higher working capital requirements (discussed above) as compared to the same periods in 2017, as well as the payment of $7.0 million of the $8.0 million of financing costs incurred in the second quarter of 2018 in connection with the arrangement of our New Credit Facility, and $11.3 million of finance lease payments (including accrued interest and fees) we made to settle our outstanding solar equipment leases in the first quarter of 2018. In addition, the first half of 2017 benefited from the repayment of $12.5 million of advances by a former solar supplier. We continue to invest in our manufacturing capabilities globally and to support new customer programs (see “Cash used in investing activities” below).
Non-IFRS free cash flow is defined as cash provided by or used in operations after the purchase of property, plant and equipment (net of proceeds from the sale of certain surplus equipment and property), finance lease payments, repayments from a former solar supplier, and finance costs paid. As a measure of liquidity, we intend to include any amounts we receive from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated, in non-IFRS free cash flow in the period of receipt. Note that non-IFRS free cash flow, however, does not represent residual cash flow available to Celestica for discretionary expenditures. Management uses non-IFRS free cash flow as a measure, in addition to IFRS cash provided by or used in operations, to assess our operational cash flow performance. We believe non-IFRS free cash flow provides another level of transparency to our liquidity. A reconciliation of this measure to cash provided by (used in) operating activities measured under IFRS is set forth below:
21
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
IFRS cash provided by (used in) operations | $ | 55.2 | $ | (14.9 | ) | $ | 90.8 | $ | (20.3 | ) | |||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net of sales proceeds | (24.1 | ) | (25.1 | ) | (49.0 | ) | (38.8 | ) | |||||||
Finance lease payments | (1.6 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (12.6 | ) | |||||||
Repayments from former solar supplier | 5.7 | — | 12.5 | — | |||||||||||
Finance costs paid | (2.4 | ) | (12.2 | ) | (4.9 | ) | (15.4 | ) | |||||||
Non-IFRS free cash flow | $ | 32.8 | $ | (53.0 | ) | $ | 46.3 | $ | (87.1 | ) | |||||
Cash used in investing activities:
Our capital expenditures for the second quarter and first half of 2018 were $25.1 million and $42.3 million, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $24.1 million and $49.6 million, respectively), primarily to enhance our manufacturing capabilities in various geographies and to support new customer programs. As a result of the demand volatility experienced with certain CCS segment customers during the past two quarters, we have shifted some of our planned expenditures into the third quarter of 2018. Our capital expenditures for the second quarter and first half of 2018 included approximately $8 million and $10 million, respectively, in building improvements at our new Toronto manufacturing site. We funded our capital expenditures from cash on hand.
In 2015, we entered into a supply agreement with a solar supplier (which was terminated in the fourth quarter of 2016) that included a commitment by us to provide cash advances to help secure our solar cell supply. All such cash advances were repaid in full by the second quarter of 2017. We received cash advance repayments of $5.7 million and $12.5 million from this solar supplier in the second quarter and first half of 2017, respectively. See “Overview — Recent developments” above for a discussion of accounts receivable that currently remain outstanding from this former solar supplier.
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities:
Share repurchases:
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid $3.2 million and $38.3 million (including transaction fees), respectively, to repurchase and cancel 0.3 million and 3.6 million subordinate voting shares, respectively, under the 2017 NCIB at a weighted average price of $12.28 and $10.75 per share, respectively. We did not repurchase any subordinate voting shares for cancellation during the second quarter or first half of 2017.
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid $5.3 million and $9.6 million (including transaction fees), respectively, for a broker's purchase of 0.4 million and 0.8 million subordinate voting shares, respectively, in the open market to satisfy obligations under our stock-based compensation plans (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $5.2 million and $6.5 million, respectively, paid to purchase 0.37 million and 0.46 million subordinate voting shares, respectively, for such purpose).
Financing:
During the second quarter and first half of each of 2017 and 2018, we made scheduled principal repayments of $6.25 million and $12.5 million, respectively, under the Prior Term Loan, and we made a $15.0 million repayment under the Prior Revolver during the first quarter of 2017.
During the second quarter of 2018, we borrowed a total of $163.0 million under the Prior Revolver, primarily to fund the Atrenne acquisition in April 2018, as well as for working capital requirements. In connection with the refinancing of the Prior Facility (described below), we drew $350.0 million under the New Term Loan primarily to repay all amounts outstanding (as of June 27, 2018) under the Prior Term Loan ($175.0 million) and Prior Revolver ($163.0 million), as well as costs related to the arrangement of the New Credit Facility. The Prior Facility was terminated on such repayment.
22
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid finance costs of $12.2 million and $15.4 million, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $2.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively). During the second quarter and first half of 2018, these payments included $7.0 million of costs related to the arrangement of the New Credit Facility, as well as higher interest expense due to the $163.0 million drawn on the Prior Revolver during the second quarter of 2018, as well as higher fees associated with the sale of A/R, and higher interest expense on the Prior Term Loan due to increasing interest rates. In the second quarter and first half of 2018, we incurred interest expense under the Prior Facility of $3.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively (each of the second quarter and first half of 2017 — $1.6 million and $3.3 million, respectively). The interest expense on the New Term Loan for the second quarter of 2018 was insignificant due to the timing of the draw (June 27, 2018).
Finance lease payments:
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid $0.8 million and $12.6 million under our finance lease agreements, respectively (see “Cash Requirements” below). Finance lease payments for the first half of 2018 included $11.3 million (including fees and accrued interest) we paid in January 2018 to settle and terminate our solar panel equipment leases in anticipation of the sale of such equipment. Payments made under finance leases reduce our non-IFRS free cash flow. At June 30, 2018, we had a total of $10.3 million finance lease obligations outstanding (December 31, 2017 — $17.7 million).
Cash requirements:
We maintain a revolving credit facility, uncommitted bank overdraft facilities, and an A/R sales program, and we participate in a customer's supplier financing program, to provide short-term liquidity and to have funds available for working capital and other investments to support our strategic priorities. Our working capital requirements can vary significantly from month-to-month due to a range of business factors, including the ramping of new programs, expansion of our services and business operations, timing of purchases, higher levels of inventory for new programs and anticipated customer demand, timing of payments and A/R collections, and customer forecasting variations. The international scope of our operations may also create working capital requirements in certain countries while other countries generate cash in excess of working capital needs. Moving cash between countries on a short-term basis to fund working capital is not always expedient due to local currency regulations, tax considerations, and other factors. To meet our working capital requirements and to provide short-term liquidity, we may draw on our revolving facility, sell A/R through our A/R sales program or participate in a customer's supplier financing program, while available. The timing and the amounts we borrow or repay under these facilities can vary significantly from month-to-month depending upon our cash requirements. In recent periods, we have increased the amounts sold under our A/R sales program as a cost-effective alternative to drawing on our revolving facility to meet our ordinary course cash requirements. However, since our A/R sales program and the supplier financing program are both on an uncommitted basis, there can be no assurance that any participant bank will purchase the accounts receivable we wish to sell to them under these programs. See “Capital Resources” below.
We do not believe that the aggregate amounts currently outstanding under our New Credit Facility (described under "Capital Resources" below) will have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, our results of operations or financial condition. We are required to make quarterly principal repayments on the New Term Loan of $0.875 million, and commencing in 2020, we are also required to make annual prepayments of the New Term Loan ranging from 0% — 50% (based on a defined leverage ratio) of specified excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit Facility) for the prior fiscal year. Proceeds from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated after 2018, would be taken into account in the determination of excess cash flow. In addition, prepayments of all borrowings under the New Credit Facility may be required in the amount of specified net cash proceeds received above a specified annual threshold (including proceeds from the disposal of certain assets, but excluding the net proceeds from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated). We anticipate that interest under the New Credit Facility, based on current interest rates and amounts outstanding, will be approximately $4.5 million per quarter, including the quarterly amortization of the $8.0 million in deferred financing costs incurred in connection with its arrangement. Any increase in prevailing interest rates, margins, or amounts outstanding, could cause this amount to increase. See “Capital Resources — Financial risks — Interest rate risk” below. We believe that cash flow from operating activities, together with cash on hand, availability under the New Revolver and intra-day and overnight bank overdraft facilities, and cash from the sale of A/R, will be sufficient to fund our currently anticipated working capital needs and planned capital spending (including the commitments described elsewhere herein).
We may use cash on hand, issue debt (including convertible debt) or equity securities, and are likely to increase our levels of third-party indebtedness (or any combination thereof) to fund operations and/or make acquisitions. In connection therewith, we refinanced the Prior Facility prior to its scheduled expiration to increase our borrowing capacity. Any significant use of cash may adversely impact our cash position and liquidity. Any issuance or incurrence of debt would increase our debt leverage, and may reduce our debt agency ratings. In addition, any issuance of equity or convertible debt securities (the pricing of which would be
23
subject to market conditions at the time of issuance) could dilute current shareholders’ positions; debt or convertible debt securities could have rights and privileges senior to those of equity holders; and the terms of debt securities could impose restrictions on our operations. Sales of our equity securities or convertible debt, or the perception that these sales could occur, could also cause the market price of our subordinate voting shares to decline. Any increase in our overall debt levels could: limit our ability to refinance our indebtedness on terms acceptable to us or at all; limit our flexibility to plan for and adjust to changing business and market conditions, and increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to make interest and principal payments on such indebtedness, thereby limiting the availability of our cash flow to fund future acquisitions, working capital, business activities, and other general corporate requirements; limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, to fund growth or for general corporate purposes; and subject us to higher levels of indebtedness than our competitors, which may cause a competitive disadvantage and may reduce our flexibility in responding to increased competition. In addition, the New Credit Facility (described under “Capital Resources” below) contains restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions and require us to maintain specified financial ratios. Our ability to meet those financial ratios will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, market, and competitive factors, many of which are beyond our control. A breach of any of such covenants could result in a default under the instruments governing such indebtedness.
As at June 30, 2018, a significant portion of our cash and cash equivalents was held by foreign subsidiaries outside of Canada and is subject to withholding taxes upon repatriation under current tax laws. Cash and cash equivalents held by subsidiaries related to undistributed earnings that are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Canada (which we do not intend to repatriate in the foreseeable future) are not subject to these withholding taxes. We currently expect to repatriate approximately $10 million from our Chinese subsidiaries in the near term and have recorded the anticipated withholding taxes as deferred income tax liabilities. While some of our subsidiaries are subject to local governmental restrictions on the flow of capital into and out of their jurisdictions (including in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances to us), which is required or desirable from time to time to meet our international working capital needs and other business objectives (as described above), these restrictions have not had a material impact on our ability to meet our cash obligations. At June 30, 2018, we had approximately $333 million (December 31, 2017 — $351 million) of cash and cash equivalents that were held by foreign subsidiaries outside of Canada that we do not intend to repatriate in the foreseeable future.
Our capital spending varies each period based on the timing of new business wins and forecasted sales levels. Based on our current operating plans, we anticipate capital spending for 2018 to be approximately 1.5% to 2.0% of revenue, and expect to fund these expenditures from cash on hand and through the financing agreements described below under “Capital Resources.” As discussed in “Overview — Recent developments,” in connection with the relocation of our Toronto manufacturing operations, we will incur significant costs to transfer such operations to our new location within the Greater Toronto area, and as we prepare and customize the new site to meet our manufacturing needs. We also anticipate significant future costs relating to the interim relocation of our corporate headquarters. The costs, timing, and execution of these relocations could have a material adverse impact on our business, our operating results, and our financial position.
We have entered into financing agreements for the lease of machinery and equipment. For leases where the risks and rewards of ownership have substantially transferred to us, we capitalize the leased asset and record a corresponding liability on our consolidated balance sheet. See “Cash used in financing activities — Finance lease payments” above.
Toronto Real Property and Related Transactions:
On July 23, 2015, we entered into a property sale agreement (Property Sale Agreement) to sell our real property located in Toronto, Ontario, which includes the site of our corporate headquarters and our Toronto manufacturing operations, to a special purpose entity (Property Purchaser) to be formed by a consortium of three real estate developers. Subject to completion of the transaction, the purchase price is approximately $137 million Canadian dollars (approximately $104 million at period-end exchange rates), exclusive of applicable taxes and subject to certain adjustments. See Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Liquidity — Cash requirements” of our 2017 20-F for further detail. Assuming the timely satisfaction of various conditions, we currently anticipate the transaction to close by the end of 2018, although further delays in the approval process could move the closing to early 2019. However, there can be no assurance that this transaction will be completed when anticipated, or at all. Any amounts we receive from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated, will be included in non-IFRS free cash flow in the period of receipt, and are expected to more than offset the building improvements and other capitalized costs, as well as transition costs, associated with our relocation activities and the preparation of our new facilities. The gain on sale of the property, if completed, will be recorded as recoveries through other charges (recoveries). As part of the transaction, we have agreed, upon closing, to enter into a short-term interim lease for our existing corporate headquarters and manufacturing premises on a portion
24
of the real estate on a rent-free basis (subject to certain payments including taxes and utilities), which is to be followed by a long-term lease with the Property Purchaser for our new corporate headquarters, on commercially reasonable arm’s-length terms. Whether or not this transaction is consummated, however, we are moving our existing Toronto manufacturing operations to another location in the Greater Toronto area and in connection therewith, entered into a long-term lease in November 2017. Occupancy under this lease commenced in March 2018. We currently expect to complete the transition to this new manufacturing location by the end of the first quarter of 2019. We also intend to move our corporate headquarters to a temporary location while space in a new office building (to be built by the Property Purchaser on the site of our current location) is under construction. The temporary office relocation is currently expected to occur by the end of the first quarter of 2019. We will incur significant costs throughout the transition period (which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2017), to relocate our corporate headquarters and to transfer our Toronto manufacturing operations to its new location, and as we prepare and customize the new site to meet our manufacturing needs. These costs will consist of building improvements and new equipment which we will capitalize, as well as transition-related costs which we will record in other charges. We expect to incur approximately $17 million in capitalized costs for the new manufacturing location, to be incurred primarily during 2018 and to be funded from cash on hand. We have incurred approximately $11 million in capitalized costs through June 30, 2018 (including $8 million and $10 million recorded in the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively). Transition costs are comprised of direct relocation costs, duplicate costs (such as rent expense, utility costs, depreciation charges, and personnel costs) incurred during the transition period, as well as cease-use costs incurred in connection with idle or vacated portions of the relevant premises that we would not have incurred but for these relocations. We expect to incur total transition costs of up to $15 million through the end of the first quarter of 2019. We incurred $3.5 million and $5.2 million of such costs in the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively (fourth quarter of 2017 — $1.6 million), consisting primarily of utility costs related to idle premises, depreciation charges and personnel costs used in the operation of duplicate production lines in advance of the transition, and relocation costs. The costs, timing, and execution of these relocations could have a material adverse impact on our business, our operating results and our financial position unless and until the sale of our Toronto real property is consummated and the full purchase price is received.
We have funded and intend to continue to fund our share repurchases from cash on hand, borrowings under our revolving facility, or a combination thereof. During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid $3.2 million and $38.3 million, including transaction costs, respectively, to repurchase 0.3 million and 3.6 million subordinate voting shares in the open market, respectively for cancellation under our current NCIB (first half of 2017 — no share repurchases for cancellation). During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid $5.3 million and $9.6 million, including transaction costs, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $5.2 million and $6.5 million, respectively) to purchase subordinate voting shares in the open market through a broker to satisfy delivery requirements under our stock-based compensation plans.
We provide routine indemnifications, the terms of which range in duration and often are not explicitly defined. These may include indemnifications against third-party intellectual property infringement claims and certain third-party negligence claims for property damage. We have also provided indemnifications in connection with the sale of certain businesses and real property. The maximum potential liability from these indemnifications cannot be reasonably estimated. In some cases, we have recourse against other parties to mitigate our risk of loss from these indemnifications. Historically, we have not made significant payments relating to these types of indemnifications.
Litigation and contingencies:
In the normal course of our operations, we may be subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims, including environmental, labor, product, customer disputes, and other matters. Management believes that adequate provisions have been recorded where required. Although it is not always possible to estimate the extent of potential costs, if any, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending matters will not have a material adverse impact on our financial performance, financial position or liquidity. See “Operating Results — Income taxes” above for a description of certain tax matters.
Capital Resources
Our capital resources consist of cash provided by operating activities, access to a revolving facility, intraday and overnight bank overdraft facilities, an A/R sales program, a customer's supplier financing program, and our ability to issue debt or equity securities. We regularly review our borrowing capacity and make adjustments, as permitted, for changes in economic conditions and changes in our requirements. As part of our strategic initiatives to scale and diversify our ATS revenue base and expand our capabilities in our ATS segment, we may use cash on hand, issue equity or debt, and are likely to further increase our levels of third-party indebtedness under our New Credit Facility (or any combination thereof) in order to fund operations or acquisitions. See “Liquidity — Cash requirements” above for a discussion of potential adverse impacts from such actions. We centrally manage
25
our funding and treasury activities in accordance with corporate policies, the main objectives of which are to ensure appropriate levels of liquidity, to have funds available for working capital or other investments we determine are required to grow our business, to comply with debt covenants, to maintain adequate levels of insurance, and to balance our exposures to market risks.
At June 30, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $401.4 million (December 31, 2017 — $515.2 million), of which approximately 97% was cash and 3% was cash equivalents, consisting of bank deposits. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents was denominated in U.S. dollars, and the remainder was held primarily in Chinese renminbi, Euro, Malaysian ringgit, and Canadian dollars. Our cash and cash equivalents are subject to intra-quarter swings, generally related to the timing of A/R collections, inventory purchases and payments, and other capital uses.
Until June 27, 2018, we were party to the Prior Facility, that consisted of our $300.0 million Prior Revolver and our fully drawn $250.0 million Prior Term Loan, each of which was scheduled to mature in May 2020. The Prior Revolver had an accordion feature that allowed us to increase the $300.0 million limit by an additional $150.0 million on an uncommitted basis upon satisfaction of certain terms and conditions. The Prior Revolver also included a $25.0 million swing line, subject to the overall revolving credit limit, that provided for short-term borrowings up to a maximum of seven days. Borrowings under the Prior Revolver bore interest at various base rates selected by us consisting of LIBOR, Prime, Base Rate Canada, and Base Rate (each as defined in the Prior Facility), plus a specified margin. The margin for borrowings under the Prior Revolver ranged from 0.6% to 1.4% (except in the case of the LIBOR base rate, in which case, the margin ranged from 1.6% to 2.4%), based on a specified financial ratio based on indebtedness. Outstanding amounts under the Prior Revolver were due at maturity (but were required to be repaid prior thereto under specified circumstances). The Prior Term Loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.0% to 3.0% based on the same financial ratio. The Prior Term Loan required quarterly principal repayments of $6.25 million, with the remainder due at maturity. Prepayments on the Prior Term Loan were required under certain circumstances. We were required to comply with certain restrictive covenants under the Prior Facility, including those relating to the incurrence of senior ranking indebtedness, the sale of assets, a change of control, and certain financial covenants related to indebtedness and interest coverage. Certain of our assets were pledged as security for borrowings under this facility.
On June 27, 2018, we entered into the New Credit Facility with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto, which provides for the $350.0 million New Term Loan that matures in June 2025, and the $450.0 million New Revolver that matures in June 2023. The net proceeds from the New Term Loan were used primarily to repay all amounts outstanding under the Prior Facility, which was terminated on such repayment, as well as costs related to the arrangement of the New Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2018, the full amount of the New Term Loan was outstanding, and other than ordinary course letters of credit, there were no amounts outstanding under the New Revolver.
The New Term Loan requires quarterly principal repayments of $0.875 million, commencing September 30, 2018, and a lump sum repayment of the remainder outstanding at maturity. Commencing in 2020, we are also required to make annual prepayments of the New Term Loan ranging from 0% — 50% (based on a defined leverage ratio) of specified excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit Facility) for the prior fiscal year. Proceeds from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated after 2018, would be taken into account in the determination of excess cash flow. In addition, prepayments of all borrowings under the New Credit Facility may be required in the amount of specified net cash proceeds received above a specified annual threshold (including proceeds from the disposal of certain assets, but excluding the net proceeds from the sale of our Toronto real estate, if consummated). Except under specified circumstances, and subject to the payment of breakage costs (if any), we are generally permitted to make voluntary prepayments of outstanding amounts under the New Revolver and the New Term Loan without any other premium or penalty.
The New Credit Facility has an accordion feature that allows us to increase the term loans and/or revolving loan commitments thereunder by an additional $150.0 million, plus an unlimited amount to the extent that a specified leverage ratio on a pro forma basis does not exceed specified limits, in each case on an uncommitted basis and subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions. The New Revolver also includes a $50.0 million sub-limit for swing line loans, providing for short-term borrowings up to a maximum of ten business days, as well as a $150.0 million sub-limit for letters of credit, in each case subject to the overall New Revolver credit limit. The New Revolver permits us and certain designated subsidiaries to borrow funds (subject to specified conditions) for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, certain acquisitions, and working capital needs. Borrowings under the New Revolver bear interest at LIBOR, Canadian Prime, or Base Rate (each as defined in the New Credit Facility) plus a specified margin, or in the case of any bankers' acceptance, at the B/A Discount Rate (as defined in the New Credit Facility). The margin for borrowings under the New Revolver ranges from 0.75% to 2.5%, depending on the rate we select and our consolidated leverage ratio. The New Term Loan currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% (which we may change to the Base Rate plus a margin of 1% if more advantageous).
26
We are required to comply with certain restrictive covenants under the New Credit Facility, including those relating to the incurrence of certain indebtedness, the existence of certain liens, the sale of certain assets (excluding real property currently held for sale), specified investments and payments, sale and leaseback transactions, and certain financial covenants relating to a defined interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio that are tested on a quarterly basis. At June 30, 2018, we were in compliance with all restrictive and financial covenants under the New Credit Facility. The obligations under the New Credit Facility are guaranteed by us and certain specified subsidiaries. Subject to specified exemptions and limitations, all assets of the guarantors are pledged as security for the obligations under the New Credit Facility. The New Credit Facility contains customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the administrative agent may declare all amounts outstanding under the New Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable and may cancel the lenders’ commitments to make further advances thereunder. In the event of a payment or other specified defaults, outstanding obligations accrue interest at a specified default rate.
We incurred debt issuance costs of $4.9 million in connection with the New Term Loan, which we recorded as an offset against the proceeds from the New Term Loan. Such costs have been deferred (as long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheet) and will be amortized over the term of the New Term Loan using the effective interest rate method. We incurred debt issuance costs of $3.1 million in connection with the New Revolver, which have been deferred (as other assets on our consolidated balance sheet) and will be amortized over the term of the New Revolver. We accelerated the amortization of the remaining $1.2 million of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the Prior Facility upon its termination ($0.6 million related to our Prior Revolver recorded in other assets and $0.6 million related to our Prior Term Loan recorded in long-term debt), and recorded it to other charges on our consolidated financial statements in June 2018.
Commitment fees paid in the second quarter and first half of 2018 were $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively). At June 30, 2018, we had $22.1 million outstanding in letters of credit under the New Revolver (December 31, 2017 — $23.2 million outstanding in letters of credit under the Prior Revolver). We also arrange letters of credit and surety bonds outside of our revolving facilities. At June 30, 2018, we had $13.4 million (December 31, 2017 — $13.6 million) of such letters of credit and surety bonds outstanding.
At June 30, 2018, we also had a total of $73.5 million in uncommitted bank overdraft facilities available for intraday and overnight operating requirements under the New Credit Facility (December 31, 2017 — $73.5 million available under the Prior Facility). There were no amounts outstanding under these overdraft facilities at June 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017.
At June 30, 2018, there was $350.0 million outstanding under the New Term Loan and other than ordinary course letters of credit described above, there were no amounts outstanding under the New Revolver (December 31, 2017 — $187.5 million outstanding under the Prior Term Loan and other than ordinary course letters of credit, no amounts outstanding under the Prior Revolver).
During the second quarter of 2018, we borrowed a total of $163.0 million under the Prior Revolver, primarily to fund the Atrenne acquisition in April 2018, as well as for working capital requirements. We made the scheduled quarterly principal repayment of $6.25 million under the Prior Term Loan in the first and second quarters of each of 2018 and 2017. The outstanding amounts under the Prior Revolver ($163.0 million) and the Prior Term Loan ($175.0 million) as of June 27, 2018 were repaid in June 2018 using the net proceeds from the New Term Loan. The Prior Facility was terminated on such repayment. During the first quarter of 2017, we repaid the remaining $15.0 million then-outstanding under the Prior Revolver.
In the second quarter and first half of 2018, we incurred interest expense under the Prior Facility of $3.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $1.6 million and $3.3 million, respectively). The interest expense on the New Term Loan for the second quarter of 2018 was insignificant due to the timing of the draw (June 27, 2018).
At June 30, 2018, we had $427.9 million available under the New Revolver for future borrowings, reflecting outstanding letters of credit (December 31, 2017 — $276.8 million available under the Prior Revolver) .
We have an accounts receivable sales agreement to sell up to $200.0 million at any one time in accounts receivable on an uncommitted basis (subject to pre-determined limits by customer) to two third-party banks. The term of this agreement has been annually extended in recent years (including in November 2017) for additional one-year periods (and is currently extendable to November 2019 under specified circumstances), but may be terminated earlier as provided in the agreement. At June 30, 2018, $113.0 million (December 31, 2017 — $80.0 million) of A/R were sold under this program, and de-recognized from our accounts receivable balance. As our A/R sales program is on an uncommitted basis, there can be no assurance that any of the banks will
27
purchase the A/R we intend to sell to them under this program. We have increased the amounts sold under our A/R sales program in recent periods as a cost-effective alternative to drawing on our Revolving Facility to fund our ordinary course cash requirements.
We have entered into an agreement with a third-party bank as part of a customer's supplier financing program, pursuant to which participating suppliers may sell accounts receivable from such customer to a third-party bank on an uncommitted basis in order to receive earlier payment. At June 30, 2018, we sold $76.0 million of accounts receivable under this program (December 31, 2017 — $52.3 million). We utilized this program to substantially offset the effect of extended payment terms required by such customer on our working capital for the period. As the supplier financing program is on an uncommitted basis, there can be no assurance that the bank will purchase the A/R we intend to sell to them thereunder.
The timing and the amounts we borrow and repay under our revolving credit and overdraft facilities, or sell under our A/R sales program or the supplier financing program, can vary significantly from month-to-month depending upon our working capital and other cash requirements. Our strategy on capital risk management has not changed significantly since the end of 2017. Other than the restrictive and financial covenants associated with our New Credit Facility noted above, we are not subject to any contractual or regulatory capital requirements. While some of our international operations are subject to government restrictions on the flow of capital into and out of their jurisdictions, these restrictions have not had a material impact on our operations or cash flows.
Financial instruments:
Our short-term investment objectives are to preserve principal and to maximize yields without significantly increasing risk, while at the same time not materially restricting our short-term access to cash.
The majority of our cash balances are held in U.S. dollars. We price the majority of our products in U.S. dollars and the majority of our materials costs are also denominated in U.S. dollars. However, a significant portion of our non-materials costs (including payroll, pensions, site costs and costs of locally sourced supplies and inventory) are denominated in various other currencies. As a result, we may experience foreign exchange gains or losses on translation or transactions due to currency fluctuations.
We have a foreign exchange risk management policy in place to govern our hedging activities. We do not enter into speculative trades. Our current hedging activity is designed to reduce the variability of our foreign currency costs where we have local manufacturing operations. We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge our cash flow exposures and foreign currency swaps to hedge our balance sheet exposures. Balance sheet hedges are based on our forecasts of the future position of net monetary assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and, therefore, may not mitigate the full impact of any translation impacts in the future. There can be no assurance that our hedging transactions will be successful in mitigating our foreign exchange risk.
See note 15 to our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements for a listing of our foreign exchange forwards and swaps to trade U.S. dollars for specified currencies at June 30, 2018. The fair value of our outstanding foreign exchange forwards and swaps at June 30, 2018 was a net unrealized loss of $8.9 million (December 31, 2017 — net unrealized gain of $10.3 million). The unrealized gains or losses result from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between the date the currency forward or swap contracts were entered into and the valuation date at period end.
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to our primary market risk exposures or our management of such exposures during the three months ended June 30, 2018 from the description set forth in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Capital Resources — Financial Risks” of our 2017 20-F. However, in connection with our New Credit Facility, we expect to enter into an agreement during the third quarter of 2018 to swap the variable interest rate (based on LIBOR plus a margin) on the New Term Loan for a fixed interest rate for half of its outstanding balance.
Interest rate risk: Borrowings under the New Credit Facility bear interest at specified rates, plus specified margins (as described above). Our borrowings under this facility expose us to interest rate risk due to potential increases to the specified rates and margins. A one-percentage point increase in these rates would increase interest expense, based on outstanding borrowings of $350 million as of June 30, 2018, by $3.5 million annually.
Also see note 15 to our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements and note 21 to our 2017 AFS.
28
Related Party Transactions
Onex Corporation (Onex) beneficially owns or controls, directly or indirectly, all of our outstanding multiple voting shares. Accordingly, Onex has the ability to exercise significant influence over our business and affairs and generally has the power to determine all matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders where the subordinate voting shares and multiple voting shares vote together as a single class. Mr. Gerald Schwartz, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Onex, indirectly owns shares representing the majority of the voting rights of Onex.
In January 2009, we entered into a Services Agreement with Onex for the services of Mr. Schwartz (amended in 2017 to replace references to Mr. Schwartz with references to Mr. Tawfiq Popatia) as a director of Celestica, pursuant to which Onex receives compensation for such services. The initial term of this agreement was one year and it automatically renews for successive one-year terms unless either party provides a notice of intent not to renew. Under such agreement, as amended, the annual fee payable to Onex is $235,000 payable in DSUs in equal quarterly installments in arrears. The Services Agreement terminates automatically and the rights of Onex to receive compensation (other than accrued and unpaid compensation) will terminate (a) 30 days after the first day on which Onex ceases to hold at least one multiple voting share of Celestica or any successor company or (b) the date Mr. Popatia ceases to be a director of Celestica for any reason.
Approximately 30% of the interests in the Property Purchaser are to be held by a privately-held company in which Mr. Schwartz has a material interest; and approximately 25% of the interests in the Property Purchaser are to be held by an entity in which Mr. Schwartz has a non-voting interest.
Outstanding Share Data
As of July 25, 2018, we had 120,724,884 outstanding subordinate voting shares and 18,600,193 outstanding multiple voting shares. As of such date, we also had 345,577 outstanding stock options, 3,681,279 outstanding RSUs, 3,237,743 outstanding PSUs (assuming vesting of 100% of the target amount granted (amounts that will vest range from 0% to 200% of the target amount granted)), and 1,533,642 outstanding DSUs; each vested option or unit entitling the holder thereof to receive one subordinate voting share (or in certain cases, cash) pursuant to the terms thereof (subject to certain time or performance-based vesting conditions).
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures:
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the U.S. Exchange Act) designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the U.S. Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the U.S. Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2018. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to meet the requirements of Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the U.S. Exchange Act.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Due to inherent limitations in all such systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues within a company have been detected. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system are met.
29
Changes in internal control over financial reporting:
We did not identify any change in our internal control over financial reporting in connection with our evaluation thereof that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. On April 4, 2018, we completed the acquisition of Atrenne, and, as a result, have been integrating the processes and controls relating to Atrenne into our existing system of internal control over financial reporting. This process may result in changes to our internal control over financial reporting. However, we do not anticipate the integration of Atrenne to result in changes that would materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting:
Reference is made to our Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on page F-1 of our 2017 20-F. Our auditors, KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, have issued an audit report on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, which appears on page F-2 of our 2017 20-F.
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Highlights (in millions, except percentages and per share amounts):
2016* | 2017** | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | Fourth Quarter | First Quarter | Second Quarter | Third Quarter | Fourth Quarter | First Quarter | Second Quarter | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $1,554.0 | $1,623.7 | $1,482.1 | $1,557.6 | $1,532.8 | $1,570.2 | $1,499.7 | $1,695.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit % | 7.1 | % | 6.9 | % | 6.9 | % | 7.0 | % | 6.9 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 53.6 | $ | 20.9 | $ | 22.5 | $ | 34.6 | $ | 34.8 | $ | 13.6 | $ | 14.1 | $ | 16.1 | ||||||||||
Weighted average # of basic shares | 140.8 | 140.9 | 142.1 | 143.4 | 143.7 | 143.3 | 142.2 | 139.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average # of diluted shares | 143.0 | 143.4 | 144.0 | 145.5 | 145.7 | 145.5 | 143.5 | 140.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
# of shares outstanding | 140.8 | 140.9 | 143.2 | 143.6 | 143.7 | 141.8 | 139.6 | 139.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
IFRS EPS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
basic | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||||
diluted | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.11 | ||||||||||
* 2016 quarterly results have not been restated under IFRS 15, however, as required by the standard, comparatives for the full year 2016, as well as January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 have been restated as such results will be presented in our 2018 audited annual consolidated financial statements.
** 2017 quarterly results have been restated to reflect the adoption of IFRS 15.
Comparability quarter-to-quarter:
The quarterly data reflects the following: none of the quarters of 2016 have been restated to reflect the adoption of IFRS 15; the fourth quarters of 2016 and 2017 include the results of our annual impairment testing of goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; and all quarters have been impacted by our restructuring actions. The amounts attributable to these items vary from quarter-to-quarter.
Second quarter 2018 compared to first quarter 2018:
Revenue of $1.70 billion for the second quarter of 2018 increased 13% compared to the first quarter of 2018, due to $175.1 million in higher CCS segment revenue and $20.4 million in higher ATS segment revenue in the second quarter of 2018. Compared to the previous quarter, revenue dollars from our CCS segment increased 18%, higher than expected, primarily due to demand strength (including some seasonal demand increases) and new programs. ATS segment revenue increased 4% in the second quarter of 2018 compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to revenue attributable to Atrenne. Gross profit for the second quarter of 2018 increased 12% compared to the first quarter of 2018 due to the impact of higher sequential revenue, and improved performance in our CCS segment, which more than offset the Inventory Provision we recorded in the second quarter of 2018. Despite the higher sequential revenue, gross margin of 6.2% was flat compared to the first quarter of 2018 reflecting the change in mix in the second quarter of 2018 (with a higher concentration of CCS segment business in the second quarter compared to the ATS segment). CCS segment income for the second quarter of 2018 was $24.9 million (2.2% of CCS segment revenue) compared to $16.8 million (1.7% of CCS segment revenue) for the first quarter of 2018, primarily as a result of the higher sequential revenue,
30
and mix changes within our CCS segment, in part due to our JDM offering. ATS segment income for the second quarter of 2018 of $28.2 million (5.1% of ATS segment revenue) was relatively flat compared to the first quarter of 2018. Net earnings for the second quarter of 2018 of $16.1 million increased by 14% compared to $14.1 million from the previous quarter, primarily as a result of the higher gross profit noted above, offset in part by $5.3 million in higher other charges, primarily in connection with restructuring activities and Toronto transition costs.
Selected second quarter 2018 IFRS results:
Actual | |
IFRS revenue (in billions) | $1.70 |
IFRS EPS (diluted)* | $0.11 |
IFRS earnings before income taxes as a % of revenue | 1.2% |
* IFRS EPS for the second quarter of 2018 included an aggregate charge of $0.16 (pre-tax) per share for employee stock-based compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software), Toronto transition costs (described below), and restructuring charges. This aggregate charge is within the range we provided on April 27, 2018 of an aggregate charge of between $0.13 to $0.19 per share for these items.
Second quarter 2018 actual compared to guidance provided on April 27, 2018:
Q2 2018 | |||
Guidance | Actual | ||
IFRS revenue (in billions) | $1.575 to $1.675 | $1.70 | |
Non-IFRS operating margin | 3.2% at the mid-point of our revenue and non-IFRS adjusted EPS guidance ranges | 3.1% | |
Non-IFRS adjusted SG&A (in millions) | $51.0 to $53.0 | $48.3 | |
Non-IFRS adjusted EPS (diluted) | $0.25 to $0.31 | $0.29 | |
For the second quarter of 2018, our revenue was above our guidance range, driven by higher-than-expected demand from certain customers in our CCS segment. Although overall revenue was above our guidance range, our non-IFRS operating margin of 3.1% for the second quarter of 2018 compared to guidance of 3.2% at the mid-point of our revenue and non-IFRS adjusted EPS guidance ranges for the quarter, and was negatively impacted primarily by a higher-than-expected mix of CCS revenue and inventory provisions for certain aged items in the quarter. Our non-IFRS adjusted SG&A of $48.3 million was lower than our expectations, primarily due to lower discretionary spend and the foreign exchange gains we recorded in the second quarter of 2018. Our non-IFRS adjusted effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2018 was 17%. We expect our non-IFRS adjusted 2018 annual effective tax rate to be between 17% and 19%.
Our guidance includes a range for adjusted EPS (which is a non-IFRS measure and is defined below). Management considers non-IFRS adjusted EPS to be an important measure for investors to understand our core operating performance. A reconciliation of non-IFRS adjusted net earnings to IFRS net earnings is set forth below.
Non-IFRS measures:
Management uses adjusted net earnings and the other non-IFRS measures described herein (i) to assess operating performance and the effective use and allocation of resources, (ii) to provide more meaningful period-to-period comparisons of operating results, (iii) to enhance investors’ understanding of the core operating results of our business, and (iv) to set management incentive targets. We believe the non-IFRS measures we present herein are useful to investors, as they enable investors to evaluate and compare our results from operations in a more consistent manner (by excluding specific items that we do not consider to be reflective of our ongoing operating results), to evaluate cash resources that we generate each period, and to provide an analysis of operating results using the same measures our chief operating decision makers use to measure performance. In addition, management believes that the use of a non-IFRS adjusted tax expense and a non-IFRS adjusted effective tax rate provides improved insight into the tax effects of our ongoing business operations, and is useful to management and investors for historical comparisons and forecasting. These non-IFRS financial measures result largely from management’s determination that the facts and circumstances surrounding the excluded charges or recoveries are not indicative of the ordinary course of the ongoing operation of our business.
31
We believe investors use both IFRS and non-IFRS measures to assess management’s past, current and future decisions associated with our priorities and our allocation of capital, as well as to analyze how our business operates in, or responds to, swings in economic cycles or to other events that impact our core operations.
In addition to cash cycle days (including the components thereof) and inventory turns (each described under the caption “Other Performance Indicators” above), which have no defined meanings under IFRS, we use the following non-IFRS measures: adjusted gross profit, adjusted gross margin (adjusted gross profit as a percentage of revenue), adjusted SG&A, adjusted SG&A as a percentage of revenue, operating earnings (adjusted EBIAT), operating margin (adjusted EBIAT as a percentage of revenue), adjusted net earnings, adjusted EPS, adjusted ROIC, free cash flow, adjusted tax expense and adjusted effective tax rate. Adjusted EBIAT, adjusted ROIC, free cash flow, adjusted tax expense and adjusted effective tax rate are further described in the tables below. In calculating these non-IFRS financial measures, management excludes the following items, where applicable: employee stock-based compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software), restructuring and other charges, net of recoveries (including Toronto transition costs (recoveries), acquisition-related costs, legal settlements (recoveries), and the accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs (each described below)), impairment charges (i.e., the write-down of goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment), other solar charges, and the Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment (each described below), all net of the associated tax adjustments (which are set forth in the table below), deferred tax write-offs/costs or recoveries associated with restructuring actions or restructured sites, and non-core tax impacts (described below).
Non-IFRS measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Non-IFRS measures are not measures of performance under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for any standardized measure under IFRS. The most significant limitation to management’s use of non-IFRS financial measures is that the charges or credits excluded from the non-IFRS measures are nonetheless charges or credits that are recognized under IFRS and that have an economic impact on us. Management compensates for these limitations primarily by issuing IFRS results to show a complete picture of our performance, and reconciling non-IFRS results back to IFRS results.
The economic substance of these exclusions and management’s rationale for excluding them from non-IFRS financial measures is provided below:
Employee stock-based compensation expense, which represents the estimated fair value of stock options, RSUs and PSUs granted to employees, is excluded because grant activities vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter in both quantity and fair value. In addition, excluding this expense allows us to better compare core operating results with those of our competitors who also generally exclude employee stock-based compensation expense in assessing operating performance, who may have different granting patterns and types of equity awards, and who may use different valuation assumptions than we do.
Amortization charges (excluding computer software) consist of non-cash charges against intangible assets that are impacted by the timing and magnitude of acquired businesses. Amortization of intangible assets varies among our competitors, and we believe that excluding these charges permits a better comparison of core operating results with those of our competitors who also generally exclude amortization charges in assessing operating performance.
Restructuring and other charges, net of recoveries, include costs relating to employee severance, lease terminations, site closings and consolidations, write-downs of owned property and equipment which are no longer used and are available for sale, reductions in infrastructure, Toronto transition costs (recoveries) (discussed below), acquisition-related consulting, transaction and integration costs, legal settlements (recoveries), and the accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs (discussed below). We exclude restructuring and other charges, net of recoveries, because we believe that they are not directly related to ongoing operating results and do not reflect expected future operating expenses after completion of these activities. We believe these exclusions permit a better comparison of our core operating results with those of our competitors who also generally exclude these charges, net of recoveries, in assessing operating performance.
Restructuring and other charges, net of recoveries, includes Toronto transition costs (recoveries), which are costs (recoveries) recorded in connection with the sale of our Toronto real property, the relocation of our existing Toronto manufacturing operations, the move of our corporate headquarters to a temporary location while space in a new office building for such headquarters at our current location (to be built by, and which we intend to lease from, the purchasers of our Toronto real property) is under construction, as well as the move to such new office space upon its completion. Toronto transition costs consist of direct relocation costs, duplicate costs (such as rent expense, utility costs, depreciation charges, and personnel costs) incurred during the transition
32
period, as well as cease-use costs incurred in connection with idle or vacated portions of the relevant premises that we would not have incurred but for these relocations. Toronto transition recoveries will consist of amounts received from the purchasers of the Toronto real property or gains we record in connection with its sale, if consummated. We believe that excluding these costs and recoveries permits a better comparison of our core operating results from period-to-period, as these costs will not reflect our ongoing operations once these relocations are complete.
Restructuring and other charges, net of recoveries, includes the accelerated amortization of $1.2 million in unamortized deferred financing costs recorded on the extinguishment of the Prior Facility during the second quarter of 2018. We have excluded the impact of this non-cash charge because we believe such exclusion permits a better comparison of our core operating results from period-to-period, as this charge is not representative of our typical operational charges.
Impairment charges, which consist of non-cash charges against goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, result primarily when the carrying value of these assets exceeds their recoverable amount. Our competitors may record impairment charges at different times, and we believe that excluding these charges permits a better comparison of our core operating results with those of our competitors who also generally exclude these charges in assessing operating performance.
Other solar charges, consisting of non-cash charges to further write down the carrying value of our then-remaining solar panel inventory and the write-down of solar accounts receivable (A/R) (primarily as a result of a solar customer's bankruptcy) to estimated recoverable amounts, were recorded in the second quarter of 2017 through cost of sales and SG&A expenses, respectively. Both of these impairment charges, which were identified during the wind down phase of our solar operations after our decision to exit the solar panel manufacturing business, are excluded as they pertain to a business we have exited, and we therefore believe they are no longer directly related to our ongoing core operating results. Although we recorded significant impairment charges to write down our solar panel inventory in the third quarter of 2016, those charges were not excluded in the determination of our non-IFRS financial measures for such period, as we were then still engaged in the solar panel manufacturing business. In connection with this wind-down, we also recorded net non-cash impairment charges to write down the carrying value of our solar panel manufacturing equipment held for sale to its estimated sales value less costs to sell, which we recorded through other charges during 2017.
The Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment consists of a $1.6 million write-up of the inventory acquired in connection with our purchase of Atrenne, representing the difference between the cost and fair value of such inventory. Acquired assets and liabilities are recorded on our balance sheet at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. The amount of the Atrenne fair value adjustment is recognized through cost of sales as the inventory is sold. During the second quarter of 2018, we recognized the full $1.6 million adjustment (as such acquired inventory was sold during the quarter), which negatively impacted our gross profit and net earnings for the period. We have excluded the impact of this adjustment (which is not applicable to any other period) because we believe such exclusion permits a better comparison of our core operating results from period-to-period, as the impact of the fair value adjustment is not indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
Deferred tax write-offs/costs or recoveries associated with restructuring actions or restructured sites are excluded, as we believe that these write-offs/costs or recoveries do not reflect core operating performance and vary significantly among those of our competitors who also generally exclude these costs or recoveries in assessing operating performance. The impact of infrequent or unusual tax items (non-core tax impacts) are excluded because we believe such exclusion permits a better comparison of our core operating results from period to period, as the impact of such items is not indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the various non-IFRS measures discussed above, and a reconciliation of IFRS to non-IFRS measures, (in millions, except percentages and per share amounts):
33
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | % of | ||||||||||||||||||
revenue | revenue | revenue | revenue | ||||||||||||||||||
IFRS revenue | $ | 1,557.6 | $ | 1,695.2 | $ | 3,039.7 | $ | 3,194.9 | |||||||||||||
IFRS gross profit | $ | 108.8 | 7.0 | % | $ | 104.8 | 6.2 | % | $ | 211.3 | 7.0% | $ | 198.3 | 6.2% | |||||||
Employee stock-based compensation expense | 3.4 | 2.8 | 8.5 | 7.9 | |||||||||||||||||
Other solar charges (inventory write-down) | 0.9 | — | 0.9 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment | — | 1.6 | — | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-IFRS adjusted gross profit | $ | 113.1 | 7.3 | % | $ | 109.2 | 6.4 | % | $ | 220.7 | 7.3% | $ | 207.8 | 6.5% | |||||||
IFRS SG&A | $ | 50.4 | 3.2 | % | $ | 52.7 | 3.1 | % | $ | 104.1 | 3.4% | $ | 105.0 | 3.3% | |||||||
Employee stock-based compensation expense | (2.3 | ) | (4.4 | ) | (8.2 | ) | (9.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other solar charges (A/R write-down) | (0.5 | ) | — | (0.5 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Non-IFRS adjusted SG&A | $ | 47.6 | 3.1 | % | $ | 48.3 | 2.8 | % | $ | 95.4 | 3.1% | $ | 95.3 | 3.0% | |||||||
IFRS earnings before income taxes | $ | 39.0 | 2.5 | % | $ | 20.9 | 1.2 | % | $ | 69.5 | 2.3% | $ | 40.3 | 1.2% | |||||||
Finance costs | 2.6 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 8.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Employee stock-based compensation expense | 5.7 | 7.2 | 16.7 | 17.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software) | 1.5 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Net restructuring, impairment and other charges (recoveries) (1) | 8.0 | 15.8 | 15.6 | 26.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Other solar charges (inventory and A/R write-down) | 1.4 | — | 1.4 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment | — | 1.6 | — | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-IFRS operating earnings (adjusted EBIAT) (1) | $ | 58.2 | 3.7 | % | $ | 53.1 | 3.1 | % | $ | 111.4 | 3.7% | $ | 97.8 | 3.1% | |||||||
IFRS net earnings | $ | 34.6 | 2.2 | % | $ | 16.1 | 0.9 | % | $ | 57.1 | 1.9% | $ | 30.2 | 0.9% | |||||||
Employee stock-based compensation expense | 5.7 | 7.2 | 16.7 | 17.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software) | 1.5 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Net restructuring, impairment and other charges (recoveries) (1) | 8.0 | 15.8 | 15.6 | 26.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Other solar charges (inventory and A/R write-down) | 1.4 | — | 1.4 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment | — | 1.6 | — | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Adjustments for taxes (2) | (4.9 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (5.7 | ) | (5.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-IFRS adjusted net earnings | $ | 46.3 | $ | 40.2 | $ | 88.1 | $ | 74.1 | |||||||||||||
Diluted EPS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average # of shares (in millions) | 145.5 | 140.7 | 144.8 | 142.1 | |||||||||||||||||
IFRS earnings per share | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||||||||
Non-IFRS adjusted earnings per share | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.52 | |||||||||||||
# of shares outstanding at period end (in millions) | 143.6 | 139.3 | 143.6 | 139.3 | |||||||||||||||||
IFRS cash provided by (used in) operations | $ | 55.2 | $ | (14.9 | ) | $ | 90.8 | $ | (20.3 | ) | |||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net of sales proceeds | (24.1 | ) | (25.1 | ) | (49.0 | ) | (38.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Finance lease payments | (1.6 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (12.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments from former solar supplier | 5.7 | — | 12.5 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Finance costs paid | (2.4 | ) | (12.2 | ) | (4.9 | ) | (15.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-IFRS free cash flow (3) | $ | 32.8 | $ | (53.0 | ) | $ | 46.3 | $ | (87.1 | ) | |||||||||||
IFRS ROIC % (4) | 14.0 | % | 6.3 | % | 12.5 | % | 6.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Non-IFRS adjusted ROIC % (4) | 20.8 | % | 16.0 | % | 20.1 | % | 15.1 | % | |||||||||||||
(1) Management uses non-IFRS operating earnings (adjusted EBIAT) as a measure to assess performance related to our core operations. Non-IFRS adjusted EBIAT is defined as earnings before finance costs (consisting of interest and fees related to our credit facility, our accounts receivable sales program, and a customer's supplier financing program), amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software) and income taxes. Non-IFRS adjusted EBIAT also excludes, in periods where such charges have been recorded, employee stock-based compensation expense, net restructuring and other charges (recoveries) (including acquisition-related consulting, transaction and integration costs (net of recoveries) (Acquisition Costs), legal settlements (recoveries), Toronto transition costs (recoveries), impairment charges (recoveries), and the accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs), other solar charges,
34
and the Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment. During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded $3.5 million and $5.2 million of Toronto transition costs, respectively, under other charges (no such costs were recorded during the second quarter or first half of 2017) and we expect these costs to continue into 2019. See "Operating Results -- Other charges" for separate quantification and discussion of restructuring charges, Toronto transition costs, Acquisition Costs, the accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs, and legal settlements (recoveries).
(2) The adjustments for taxes, as applicable, represent the tax effects of our non-IFRS adjustments, non-core tax impacts, and tax write-offs/costs or recoveries related to restructured sites (described below).
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our IFRS tax expense and IFRS effective tax rate to our non-IFRS adjusted tax expense and our non-IFRS adjusted effective tax rate for the periods indicated, in each case determined by excluding the tax benefits or costs associated with the listed items (in millions, except percentages) from our IFRS tax expense for such periods:
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | Effective tax rate | 2018 | Effective tax rate | 2017 | Effective tax rate | 2018 | Effective tax rate | ||||||||||||||||
IFRS tax expense and IFRS effective tax rate | $ | 4.4 | 11 | % | $ | 4.8 | 23 | % | $ | 12.4 | 18 | % | $ | 10.1 | 25 | % | |||||||
Tax costs (benefits) of the following items excluded from IFRS tax expense: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock-based compensation | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Net restructuring, impairment and other charges | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other solar charges (inventory and A/R write-down) | 0.4 | — | 0.4 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustment on acquisition * | — | 3.7 | — | 3.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other charges related to restructured sites ** | 3.2 | (1.6 | ) | 3.4 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-IFRS adjusted tax expense and Non-IFRS adjusted effective tax rate | $ | 9.3 | 17 | % | $ | 8.0 | 17 | % | $ | 18.1 | 17 | % | $ | 15.5 | 17 | % | |||||||
* | Deferred tax assets attributable to our acquisition of Atrenne. |
** | Deferred tax benefit related to the write-downs and impairments we recorded for our solar assets in the second quarter of 2017 and prior periods. |
(3) Management uses non-IFRS free cash flow as a measure, in addition to IFRS cash provided by (used in) operations, to assess our operational cash flow performance. We believe non-IFRS free cash flow provides another level of transparency to our liquidity. Non-IFRS free cash flow is defined as cash provided by (used in) operations after the purchase of property, plant and equipment (net of proceeds from the sale of certain surplus equipment and property), finance lease payments, repayments from a former solar supplier, and finance costs paid. As a measure of liquidity, we intend to include any amounts we receive from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated, in non-IFRS free cash flow in the period of receipt. Note that non-IFRS free cash flow, however, does not represent residual cash flow available to Celestica for discretionary expenditures.
(4) Management uses non-IFRS adjusted ROIC as a measure to assess the effectiveness of the invested capital we use to build products or provide services to our customers, by quantifying how well we generate earnings relative to the capital we have invested in our business. Our non-IFRS adjusted ROIC measure reflects non-IFRS operating earnings, working capital management and asset utilization. Non-IFRS adjusted ROIC is calculated by dividing non-IFRS adjusted EBIAT by average net invested capital. Net invested capital (calculated in the table below) consists of the following IFRS measures: total assets less cash, accounts payable, accrued and other current liabilities and provisions, and income taxes payable. We use a two-point average to calculate average net invested capital for the quarter and a three-point average to calculate average net invested capital for the six-month period. A comparable measure under IFRS would be determined by dividing IFRS earnings before income taxes by net invested capital (which we have set forth in the charts above and below), however, this measure (which we have called IFRS ROIC), is not a measure defined under IFRS.
35
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our calculation of IFRS ROIC % and non-IFRS adjusted ROIC % (in millions, except IFRS ROIC % and non-IFRS adjusted ROIC %):
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
IFRS earnings before income taxes | $ | 39.0 | $ | 20.9 | $ | 69.5 | $ | 40.3 | |||||||
Multiplier to annualize earnings | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
Annualized IFRS earnings before income taxes | $ | 156.0 | $ | 83.6 | $ | 139.0 | $ | 80.6 | |||||||
Average net invested capital for the period | $ | 1,118.2 | $ | 1,329.6 | $ | 1,110.5 | $ | 1,293.2 | |||||||
IFRS ROIC % (1) | 14.0 | % | 6.3 | % | 12.5 | % | 6.2 | % | |||||||
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Non-IFRS operating earnings (adjusted EBIAT) | $ | 58.2 | $ | 53.1 | $ | 111.4 | $ | 97.8 | |||||||
Multiplier to annualize earnings | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
Annualized non-IFRS adjusted EBIAT | $ | 232.8 | $ | 212.4 | $ | 222.8 | $ | 195.6 | |||||||
Average net invested capital for the period | $ | 1,118.2 | $ | 1,329.6 | $ | 1,110.5 | $ | 1,293.2 | |||||||
Non-IFRS adjusted ROIC % (1) | 20.8 | % | 16.0 | % | 20.1 | % | 15.1 | % | |||||||
December 31 2017 | March 31 2018 | June 30 2018 | |||||||||||||
Net invested capital consists of: | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,964.2 | $ | 2,976.0 | $ | 3,212.2 | |||||||||
Less: cash | 515.2 | 435.7 | 401.4 | ||||||||||||
Less: accounts payable, accrued and other current liabilities, provisions and income taxes payable | 1,228.6 | 1,278.1 | 1,413.8 | ||||||||||||
Net invested capital at period end (1) | $ | 1,220.4 | $ | 1,262.2 | $ | 1,397.0 | |||||||||
December 31 2016 | March 31 2017 | June 30 2017 | |||||||||||||
Net invested capital consists of: | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,841.9 | $ | 2,833.5 | $ | 2,876.7 | |||||||||
Less: cash | 557.2 | 558.0 | 582.7 | ||||||||||||
Less: accounts payable, accrued and other current liabilities, provisions and income taxes payable | 1,189.7 | 1,165.2 | 1,167.9 | ||||||||||||
Net invested capital at period end (1) | $ | 1,095.0 | $ | 1,110.3 | $ | 1,126.1 | |||||||||
(1) See footnote 4 of the previous table.
36
Exhibit 99.2
CELESTICA INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
(unaudited)
December 31 2017 | June 30 2018 | ||||||
(restated) | |||||||
Assets | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 515.2 | $ | 401.4 | |||
Accounts receivable (notes 3 & 7) | 1,023.7 | 1,125.5 | |||||
Inventories (notes 3 & 8) | 824.0 | 1,006.9 | |||||
Income taxes receivable | 1.6 | 1.6 | |||||
Assets classified as held for sale (note 9) | 30.1 | 27.4 | |||||
Other current assets | 82.0 | 89.7 | |||||
Total current assets | 2,476.6 | 2,652.5 | |||||
Property, plant and equipment | 323.9 | 340.4 | |||||
Goodwill (note 5) | 23.2 | 87.2 | |||||
Intangible assets (note 5) | 21.6 | 68.8 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 37.6 | 38.4 | |||||
Other non-current assets (note 10) | 81.3 | 24.9 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 2,964.2 | $ | 3,212.2 | |||
Liabilities and Equity | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Current portion of borrowings under credit facility and finance lease obligations (note 11) | $ | 37.9 | $ | 8.3 | |||
Accounts payable | 931.1 | 1,118.8 | |||||
Accrued and other current liabilities | 233.2 | 235.3 | |||||
Income taxes payable | 37.7 | 33.5 | |||||
Current portion of provisions | 26.6 | 26.2 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 1,266.5 | 1,422.1 | |||||
Long-term portion of borrowings under credit facility and finance lease obligations (note 11) | 166.5 | 347.1 | |||||
Pension and non-pension post-employment benefit obligations (note 10) | 97.8 | 99.0 | |||||
Provisions and other non-current liabilities | 35.4 | 31.8 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 27.8 | 21.8 | |||||
Total liabilities | 1,594.0 | 1,921.8 | |||||
Equity: | |||||||
Capital stock (note 12) | 2,048.3 | 2,003.9 | |||||
Treasury stock (note 12) | (8.7 | ) | (11.9 | ) | |||
Contributed surplus | 863.0 | 881.5 | |||||
Deficit | (1,525.7 | ) | (1,558.8 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (6.7 | ) | (24.3 | ) | |||
Total equity | 1,370.2 | 1,290.4 | |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,964.2 | $ | 3,212.2 | |||
Contingencies (note 16), Subsequent event (note 6), Transitional impacts of adopting IFRS 15 (notes 2 and 3).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
1more...
CELESTICA INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||
{ | June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 1,557.6 | $ | 1,695.2 | $ | 3,039.7 | $ | 3,194.9 | |||||||
Cost of sales (note 8) | 1,448.8 | 1,590.4 | 2,828.4 | 2,996.6 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 108.8 | 104.8 | 211.3 | 198.3 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) | 50.4 | 52.7 | 104.1 | 105.0 | |||||||||||
Research and development | 6.6 | 6.8 | 12.4 | 12.8 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2.2 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 5.7 | |||||||||||
Other charges (note 13) | 8.0 | 15.8 | 15.6 | 26.3 | |||||||||||
Earnings from operations | 41.6 | 25.8 | 74.7 | 48.5 | |||||||||||
Finance costs | 2.6 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 8.2 | |||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes | 39.0 | 20.9 | 69.5 | 40.3 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (recovery) (note 14): | |||||||||||||||
Current | 12.9 | 5.6 | 27.1 | 19.4 | |||||||||||
Deferred | (8.5 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (14.7 | ) | (9.3 | ) | |||||||
4.4 | 4.8 | 12.4 | 10.1 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings for the period | $ | 34.6 | $ | 16.1 | $ | 57.1 | $ | 30.2 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||
Shares used in computing per share amounts (in millions): | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 143.4 | 139.6 | 142.9 | 140.9 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 145.5 | 140.7 | 144.8 | 142.1 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
2more...
CELESTICA INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
(unaudited)
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the period | $ | 34.6 | $ | 16.1 | $ | 57.1 | $ | 30.2 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | |||||||||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to net earnings: | |||||||||||||||
Losses on pension and non-pension post-employment benefit plans (note 10) | — | (63.3 | ) | (17.0 | ) | (63.3 | ) | ||||||||
Items that may be reclassified to net earnings: | |||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences for foreign operations | — | (1.1 | ) | 0.8 | 0.2 | ||||||||||
Changes from derivatives designated as hedges | 9.2 | (16.3 | ) | 17.5 | (17.8 | ) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the period | $ | 43.8 | $ | (64.6 | ) | $ | 58.4 | $ | (50.7 | ) | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
3more...
CELESTICA INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
(unaudited)
Capital stock (note 12) | Treasury stock (note 12) | Contributed surplus | Deficit | Accumulated other comprehensive loss (a) | Total equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance -- January 1, 2017 | $ | 2,048.2 | $ | (15.3 | ) | $ | 862.6 | $ | (1,632.0 | ) | $ | (24.7 | ) | $ | 1,238.8 | ||||||||
Impact of change in accounting policies (notes 2 and 3) | — | — | — | 19.0 | — | 19.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Restated balance at January 1, 2017 | 2,048.2 | (15.3 | ) | 862.6 | (1,613.0 | ) | (24.7 | ) | 1,257.8 | ||||||||||||||
Capital transactions (note 12): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of capital stock | 29.8 | — | (16.6 | ) | — | — | 13.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock for stock-based plans | — | (6.5 | ) | — | — | — | (6.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and other | — | 16.9 | 0.8 | — | — | 17.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the period | — | — | — | 57.1 | — | 57.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses on pension and non-pension post-employment benefit plans (note 10) | — | — | — | (17.0 | ) | — | (17.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences for foreign operations | — | — | — | — | 0.8 | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Changes from derivatives designated as hedges | — | — | — | — | 17.5 | 17.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance -- June 30, 2017 | $ | 2,078.0 | $ | (4.9 | ) | $ | 846.8 | $ | (1,572.9 | ) | $ | (6.4 | ) | $ | 1,340.6 | ||||||||
Balance -- January 1, 2018 | $ | 2,048.3 | $ | (8.7 | ) | $ | 863.0 | $ | (1,545.2 | ) | $ | (6.7 | ) | $ | 1,350.7 | ||||||||
Impact of change in accounting policies (notes 2 and 3) | — | — | — | 19.5 | — | 19.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Restated balance at January 1, 2018 | 2,048.3 | (8.7 | ) | 863.0 | (1,525.7 | ) | (6.7 | ) | 1,370.2 | ||||||||||||||
Capital transactions (note 12): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of capital stock | 12.7 | — | (12.3 | ) | — | — | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of capital stock for cancellation | (57.1 | ) | — | 18.8 | — | — | (38.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock for stock-based plans | — | (9.6 | ) | — | — | — | (9.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and other | — | 6.4 | 12.0 | — | — | 18.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the period | — | — | — | 30.2 | — | 30.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses on pension and non-pension post-employment benefit plans (note 10) | — | — | — | (63.3 | ) | — | (63.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences for foreign operations | — | — | — | — | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Changes from derivatives designated as hedges | — | — | — | — | (17.8 | ) | (17.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance -- June 30, 2018 | $ | 2,003.9 | $ | (11.9 | ) | $ | 881.5 | $ | (1,558.8 | ) | $ | (24.3 | ) | $ | 1,290.4 | ||||||||
(a) Accumulated other comprehensive loss is net of tax.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
4more...
CELESTICA INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
(unaudited)
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in): | |||||||||||||||
Operating activities: | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the period | $ | 34.6 | $ | 16.1 | $ | 57.1 | $ | 30.2 | |||||||
Adjustments to net earnings for items not affecting cash: | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 19.1 | 21.6 | 37.5 | 42.9 | |||||||||||
Equity-settled stock-based compensation | 5.7 | 7.2 | 16.7 | 17.6 | |||||||||||
Other charges | 7.1 | 1.1 | 7.1 | 1.4 | |||||||||||
Finance costs | 2.6 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 8.2 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 4.4 | 4.8 | 12.4 | 10.1 | |||||||||||
Other | (1.2 | ) | (4.4 | ) | (4.7 | ) | (7.4 | ) | |||||||
Changes in non-cash working capital items: | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (5.4 | ) | (104.8 | ) | 47.9 | (86.4 | ) | ||||||||
Inventories | (21.1 | ) | (65.3 | ) | (74.0 | ) | (170.1 | ) | |||||||
Other current assets | 21.3 | (6.2 | ) | 12.9 | (9.6 | ) | |||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued and other current liabilities and provisions | (1.5 | ) | 121.4 | (11.9 | ) | 166.6 | |||||||||
Non-cash working capital changes | (6.7 | ) | (54.9 | ) | (25.1 | ) | (99.5 | ) | |||||||
Net income tax paid | (10.4 | ) | (11.3 | ) | (15.4 | ) | (23.8 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 55.2 | (14.9 | ) | 90.8 | (20.3 | ) | |||||||||
Investing activities: | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition, net of cash acquired (note 5) | — | (141.7 | ) | — | (141.7 | ) | |||||||||
Purchase of computer software and property, plant and equipment(a) | (24.1 | ) | (25.1 | ) | (49.6 | ) | (42.3 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds/deposits related to the sale of assets | — | — | 0.6 | 3.5 | |||||||||||
Repayment of advances from solar supplier (note 6) | 5.7 | — | 12.5 | — | |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (18.4 | ) | (166.8 | ) | (36.5 | ) | (180.5 | ) | |||||||
Financing activities: | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings under prior credit facility (note 11) | — | 163.0 | — | 163.0 | |||||||||||
Repayments under prior credit facility (note 11) | (6.3 | ) | (344.3 | ) | (27.5 | ) | (350.5 | ) | |||||||
Borrowings under new credit facility (note 11) | — | 350.0 | — | 350.0 | |||||||||||
Finance lease payments (note 11) | (1.6 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (12.6 | ) | |||||||
Issuance of capital stock (note 12) | 3.4 | 0.2 | 13.2 | 0.4 | |||||||||||
Repurchase of capital stock for cancellation (note 12) | — | (3.2 | ) | — | (38.3 | ) | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock for stock-based plans (note 12) | (5.2 | ) | (5.3 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (9.6 | ) | |||||||
Finance costs paid | (2.4 | ) | (12.2 | ) | (4.9 | ) | (15.4 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (12.1 | ) | 147.4 | (28.8 | ) | 87.0 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 24.7 | (34.3 | ) | 25.5 | (113.8 | ) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 558.0 | 435.7 | 557.2 | 515.2 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 582.7 | $ | 401.4 | $ | 582.7 | $ | 401.4 | |||||||
(a) Additional equipment of $5.0 was acquired through finance leases in the second quarter and first half of 2018 (first quarter and first half of 2017 — $5.0).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
5more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1. REPORTING ENTITY
Celestica Inc. (Celestica) is incorporated in Ontario with its corporate headquarters currently located at 844 Don Mills Road, Toronto, Ontario, M3C 1V7. Celestica’s subordinate voting shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Celestica delivers innovative supply chain solutions globally to customers in two operating and reportable segments: Advanced Technology Solutions (ATS) and Connectivity & Cloud Solutions (CCS). Our ATS segment consists of our ATS end market, and is comprised of our aerospace and defense, industrial, smart energy, healthtech, semiconductor capital equipment and consumer businesses. Our CCS segment consists of our Communications and Enterprise end markets, and is comprised of our enterprise communications, telecommunications, servers and storage businesses. See note 4 below for a discussion of the recent reorganization of our end markets and the division of our business into two operating and reportable segments. Our prior period financial information has been reclassified to reflect the reorganized segment structure and to conform to the current presentation.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Statement of compliance:
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2018 (Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements) have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34, Interim Financial Reporting, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the accounting policies we have adopted in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our 2017 annual audited consolidated financial statements (2017 AFS) and reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly our financial position as at June 30, 2018 and our financial performance, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. The Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars, which is also our functional currency. Unless otherwise noted, all financial information is presented in millions of U.S. dollars (except percentages and per share amounts).
The Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements were authorized for issuance by our board of directors on July 31, 2018.
Use of estimates and judgments:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base these estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The near-term economic environment could also impact certain estimates necessary to prepare our consolidated financial statements, including the estimates related to the recoverable amounts used in our impairment testing of our non-financial assets, and the discount rates applied to our net pension and non-pension post-employment benefit assets or liabilities. Our assessment of these factors forms the basis for our judgments on the carrying values of assets and liabilities, and the accrual of costs and expenses. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and assumptions. We review our estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis and make revisions as determined necessary by management. Revisions are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and may impact future periods. There have been no material changes to our assumptions or the judgments affecting the application of our estimates and assumptions during the second quarter and first half of 2018 from those described in the notes to our 2017 AFS. However, see “Accounting policies” below for a discussion of recently adopted accounting standards.
Accounting policies:
The Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements are based upon accounting policies consistent with those used and described in note 2 of our 2017 AFS, except for the recently adopted accounting standards discussed below.
6more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Recently adopted accounting standards:
IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
In May 2014, the IASB issued this standard, which provides a single, principles-based five-step model for revenue recognition to be applied to all customer contracts, and requires enhanced disclosures. The new standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and allowed for early adoption. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and elected to use the retrospective approach, pursuant to which we have restated each of the required comparative reporting periods presented herein and recognized the transitional adjustments through equity at the start of the first comparative reporting period presented herein. The new standard has changed the timing of our revenue recognition for a significant portion of our business, resulting in the recognition of revenue for certain customer contracts earlier than under the previous revenue recognition rules (which was generally upon delivery). The new standard has materially impacted our consolidated financial statements, primarily in relation to inventory and accounts receivable balances. Transition activities have been completed, and the necessary changes have been made to our business processes, systems and controls to support the recognition and disclosures required by the new standard. See “Changes in accounting policies” below. Also see note 3 for the transitional impacts of adopting IFRS 15.
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments:
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted IFRS 9, Financial Instruments issued by the IASB. This standard introduces a new model for the classification and measurement of financial assets, a single expected credit loss model for the measurement of the impairment of financial assets, and a new model for hedge accounting that is aligned with a company’s risk management activities. As a result of adopting IFRS 9, we have also complied with the transitional rules of IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements and IFRS 7, Financial Instruments Disclosures. Transition activities have been completed, and the necessary changes have been made to our business processes and controls to support the new standard.
Under IFRS 9, financial assets are classified as either: measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), or fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). This classification is generally based on the business model in which the financial asset is managed and its contractual cash flow characteristics. IFRS 9 eliminates the held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and available-for-sale categories previously allowed under IAS 39. Trade and non-customer receivables, that were previously classified as loans and receivables under IAS 39, are measured to amortized cost under IFRS 9. Although the classification of such assets changed, measurement of these assets continues to be at amortized cost, and no changes to their carrying amounts were required upon adopting IFRS 9. For financial liabilities, IFRS 9 largely retains the existing IAS 39 classifications, with the exception of those designated at FVTPL. Since we currently do not hold any liabilities designated as FVTPL, we were not impacted by this change. We do not currently hold any financial assets or liabilities under FVOCI.
In accordance with the transitional rules, we have applied the changes of IFRS 9 retrospectively, with the exception of the hedge accounting policies which we have applied prospectively as required by this standard. The adoption of this standard did not result in any adjustments to our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements and did not have a material impact on our accounting policies.
See “Changes in accounting policies” below for a description of accounting policy changes in connection with our adoption of IFRS 9 and IFRS 15.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements:
IFRS 16, Leases:
In January 2016, the IASB issued this standard, which brings most leases on-balance sheet for lessees under a single model, eliminating the distinction between operating and finance leases. IFRS 16 supersedes IAS 17, Leases, and related interpretations and is effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, with earlier adoption permitted. We do not intend to adopt this standard early. We have established a project team to evaluate the anticipated impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements, as well as any changes to our business processes, systems and controls that may be required to support the recognition
7more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
and disclosures required by the new standard. Transition efforts are currently underway, and are anticipated to be complete by January 1, 2019.
Changes in accounting policies:
This section should be read as a modification to the significant accounting policies in notes 2 (q), (r), (s) and (t) of our 2017 AFS and reflects accounting policy changes in connection with our adoption of IFRS 9 and IFRS 15.
(a) Financial assets and financial liabilities:
We recognize financial assets and financial liabilities initially at fair value and subsequently measure these at either fair value or amortized cost based on their classification as described below.
Fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL):
Financial assets and financial liabilities that we purchase or incur, respectively, with the intention of generating earnings in the near term, and derivatives other than cash flow hedges, are classified as FVTPL. This category includes short-term investments in money market funds (if applicable) that we group with cash equivalents, and derivative assets and derivative liabilities that do not qualify for hedge accounting. See Derivatives and hedge accounting in note (c) below for derivative contracts that qualify for hedge accounting. For investments that we classify as FVTPL, we initially recognize such financial assets on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value and recognize subsequent changes in our consolidated statement of operations. We will expense transaction costs as incurred in our consolidated statement of operations. We do not currently hold any liabilities designated as FVTPL.
Amortized cost:
We classify financial assets held to collect the contractual cash flows (in the form of payment of principal and interest earned on the principal outstanding) at amortized cost, including our trade receivables, term deposits and non-customer receivables. We initially recognize the carrying amount of such assets on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs, and subsequently measure these at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment losses.
Other financial liabilities:
This category is for our financial liabilities that are not classified as FVTPL and includes accounts payable, the majority of our accrued liabilities and certain other provisions, as well as borrowings under our credit facility, including our term loan. We record these financial liabilities at amortized cost on our consolidated balance sheet.
(b) Impairment of financial assets:
We used a forward-looking “expected credit loss” (ECL) model in determining our allowance for doubtful accounts as it relates to trade receivables, contract assets (under IFRS 15), and other assets. Our allowance is determined by historical experiences, and considers factors including the aging of the balances, the customer's credit worthiness, updates based on current economic conditions, expectation of bankruptcies, and the political and economic volatility in the markets/location of our customers. A default of accounts receivable occurs when customers are unable to pay for the goods or services we provided in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. An accounts receivable balance is written off or written down to its net realizable value as soon as it is known to be in default or in partial default. We will adjust previous write-downs to reflect changes in estimates or actual experience.
8more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(c) Derivatives and hedge accounting:
The hedge accounting standards under IFRS 9 align the accounting for hedging instruments more closely to a company's risk management practices. Based on our assessment, all hedging relationships that were designated under IAS 39 as of December 31, 2017 met the criteria for hedge accounting under IFRS 9 effective January 1, 2018, and are considered continuing hedging relationships after transition. For foreign exchange forward and swap contracts that we designate as cash flow hedges and qualify for hedge accounting, we measure these derivatives at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet, and we defer the changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative, to the extent effective, in other comprehensive income (OCI) until we recognize the asset, liability or forecasted transaction being hedged in our consolidated statement of operations.
(d) Revenue:
We derive the majority of our revenue from the sale of electronic products and services that we manufacture and provide to customer specifications. Our range of services includes, among others, design and development, engineering services, supply chain management, new product introduction, manufacturing, assembly, testing, systems integration, order fulfillment, logistics and after-market services.
We recognize revenue from the sale of products and services rendered when our performance obligation has been satisfied or when the associated control over the products sold has passed to the customer and no material uncertainties remain as to the collection of our receivables. For those businesses where the products are custom-made to meet a customers' specific requirements, and such customers are liable to compensate us for the work performed to date, we will recognize revenue over time as our production progresses to completion, or as services are rendered. We generally estimate revenue of our work in process based on costs incurred to date plus a reasonable profit margin for eligible products for which we do not have alternative uses. For other businesses that do not qualify for revenue recognition over time, we continue to recognize revenue at a point in time where control is passed to the customer, which is generally upon shipment and no further performance obligation remains except for our standard manufacturing or service warranties.
3. TRANSITION TO IFRS 15, REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
IFRS 15 establishes a comprehensive framework for determining whether, how much and when revenue should be recognized, and replaces IAS 18, Revenues, IAS 11, Construction Contracts, and related interpretations. We adopted IFRS 15 effective January 1, 2018 by applying the retrospective method, and have restated each of the required comparative reporting periods presented herein. In computing the transitional adjustments, we applied the practical expedients in accordance with IFRS 15 to exclude certain contracts that we started and completed in the same annual reporting period, or were completed prior to January 1, 2016, the beginning of the earliest period to be presented in our 2018 annual audited consolidated financial statements. We recognized the transitional adjustments through equity as of the beginning of 2017 for our Q2 2018 Interim Financial Statements.
(a) Transitional impacts:
For a significant portion of our business, the timing of our revenue recognition has changed under the new standard from a point-in-time to over time, resulting in an earlier recognition of revenue than under the previous recognition rules (which was generally upon delivery). The most significant financial impacts of adopting IFRS 15 on the comparative periods in our consolidated financial statements are summarized as follows:
9more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||
Contract assets (included in accounts receivable) | $ | 226.9 | $ | 237.7 | — | — | $ | 258.9 | ||||||||
Inventories | (206.2 | ) | (217.5 | ) | — | — | (237.8 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred taxes | (1.7 | ) | (1.8 | ) | — | — | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities | — | (0.5 | ) | — | — | (0.3 | ) | |||||||||
Deficit | (19.0 | ) | (18.9 | ) | — | — | (19.5 | ) | ||||||||
Revenue | — | — | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | 11.3 | — | ||||||||
Cost of sales | — | — | (1.3 | ) | 11.3 | — | ||||||||||
Income tax expense | — | — | 0.2 | 0.1 | — | |||||||||||
Net earnings | — | — | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | — | — | $ | — | $ | — | — | |||||||||
(b) Contract assets and liabilities:
Our contract assets consist of unbilled amounts recognized as revenue under IFRS 15 and deferred investment costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. As of June 30, 2018, we had approximately $275.3 (December 31, 2017 — $258.9) of contract assets recognized as revenue under IFRS 15, which we recorded in accounts receivable on our consolidated balance sheet. Deferred investment costs are recorded initially at cost in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet, and subsequently amortized over the projected period of expected future benefits, or as recoveries are realized, from the new contracts. We monitor our contract assets for potential impairment on a regular basis. No significant impairment losses were recorded on our contract assets during the second quarter or first half of either 2018 or 2017. Our contract liabilities consist of advance payments from customers and deferred revenue, which we recorded in accrued and other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet.
4. SEGMENT AND CUSTOMER REPORTING
Segment Reorganization:
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activities from which they may earn revenue and incur expenses; for which discrete financial information is available; and whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and to assess performance. No operating segments have been aggregated to determine our reportable segments.
During the first quarter of 2018, we completed a reorganization of our reporting structure, including our sales, operations and management systems, into two operating and reportable segments: ATS and CCS. Prior to this reorganization, we operated in one reportable segment (Electronic Manufacturing Services), which was comprised of multiple end markets (ATS, Communications and Enterprise during 2017). The change in operating and reportable segments was a result of modifications to our organizational and internal management structure which were initiated in 2017 to streamline business operations and improve profitability and competitiveness, and were completed in early 2018. As a result of these modifications, and commencing in the first quarter of 2018, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who is our chief operating decision maker, reviews segment revenue, segment income and segment margin (described below) to assess performance and make decisions about resource allocation. Our prior period financial information has been reclassified to reflect the reorganized segment structure and to conform to the current presentation.
10more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
The foregoing changes have no impact on our historical consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as previously reported.
Factors considered in determining the two reportable segments included the nature of applicable business activities, management structure, market strategy and margin profiles. Our ATS segment consists of our ATS end market, and is comprised of our aerospace and defense, industrial, smart energy, healthtech, semiconductor capital equipment, and consumer businesses. Products and services in this segment are extensive and are often more regulated than in our CCS segment, and can include the following: government-certified and highly-specialized manufacturing, electronic and enclosure-related services for aerospace and defense-related customers; high-precision equipment and integrated subsystems used in the manufacture of semiconductors; a wide range of industrial automation, controls, test and measurement devices; advanced solutions for surgical instruments, diagnostic imaging and patient monitoring; and efficiency products to help manage and monitor the energy and power industries. Our ATS segment businesses typically have a higher margin profile and longer product life cycles than the businesses in our CCS segment. Our CCS segment consists of our Communications and Enterprise end markets, and is comprised of our enterprise communications, telecommunications, servers and storage businesses. Products and services in this segment consist predominantly of enterprise-level data communications and information processing infrastructure products, and can include routers, switches, servers and storage-related products used by a wide range of businesses and cloud-based service providers to manage digital connectivity, commerce and social media applications. Our CCS segment businesses typically have a lower margin profile and higher volumes than the businesses in our ATS segment, and have been impacted in recent periods (and continue to be impacted) by aggressive pricing, rapid shifts in technology, model obsolescence and the commoditization of certain products.
Segment performance is evaluated based on segment revenue, segment income and segment margin (segment income as a percentage of segment revenue). Revenue is attributed to the segment in which the product is manufactured or the service is performed. Segment income is defined as a segment’s net revenue less its cost of sales and its allocable portion of selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses (collectively, Segment Costs). Identifiable Segment Costs are allocated directly to the applicable segment while other Segment Costs, including indirect costs and certain corporate charges, are allocated to our segments based on an analysis of the relative usage or benefit derived by each segment from such costs. Segment income excludes finance costs, amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software), employee stock-based compensation expense, net restructuring, impairment and other charges (recoveries), other solar charges, and the fair value adjustment for inventory acquired in connection with our purchase of Atrenne Integrated Solutions, Inc. (Atrenne), as these costs and charges are managed and reviewed by our CEO at the company level. Net restructuring, impairment and other charges (recoveries) include, in applicable periods, restructuring charges (recoveries), impairment charges (recoveries), acquisition-related consulting, transaction and integration costs, legal settlements (recoveries), Toronto transition costs (recoveries), and the accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs. Our segments do not record inter-segment revenue. Although segment income and segment margin are used to evaluate the performance of our segments, we may incur operating costs in one segment that may also benefit the other segment. Our accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as those applied to the company as a whole.
Information regarding the results of each reportable segment is included below:
Revenue by segment: | Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
% of total | % of total | % of total | % of total | ||||||||||||||||
ATS | $ | 478.5 | 31% | $ | 553.2 | 33% | $ | 969.9 | 32% | $ | 1,086.0 | 34% | |||||||
CCS | 1,079.1 | 69% | 1,142.0 | 67% | 2,069.8 | 68% | 2,108.9 | 66% | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,557.6 | $ | 1,695.2 | $ | 3,039.7 | $ | 3,194.9 | |||||||||||
11more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Segment income, segment margin, and reconciliation of segment income to IFRS earnings before income taxes: | Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment Margin | Segment Margin | Segment Margin | Segment Margin | ||||||||||||||||||
ATS segment income and margin | $ | 22.5 | 4.7% | $ | 28.2 | 5.1% | $ | 45.8 | 4.7 | % | $ | 56.1 | 5.2 | % | |||||||
CCS segment income and margin | 35.7 | 3.3% | 24.9 | 2.2% | 65.6 | 3.2 | % | 41.7 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||
Total segment income | 58.2 | 53.1 | 111.4 | 97.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Reconciling items: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs | 2.6 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 8.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Employee stock-based compensation expense | 5.7 | 7.2 | 16.7 | 17.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets (excluding computer software) | 1.5 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Net restructuring, impairment and other charges (see note 13) | 8.0 | 15.8 | 15.6 | 26.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Other solar charges (inventory and A/R write-down) | 1.4 | — | 1.4 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Atrenne inventory fair value adjustment (see note 5) | — | 1.6 | — | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||
IFRS earnings before income taxes | $ | 39.0 | $ | 20.9 | $ | 69.5 | $ | 40.3 | |||||||||||||
Customers:
For the second quarter and first half of 2018, we had one customer (from our CCS segment) that represented more than 10% of total revenue (second quarter and first half of 2017 — two customers (each in our CCS segment)).
Seasonality:
From time to time, we experience some level of seasonality in our quarterly revenue patterns across some of our businesses. However, numerous factors affecting our period-to-period results make it difficult to isolate the impact of seasonality and other external factors on our business. In the past, revenue from the storage component of our CCS segment has increased in the fourth quarter of the year compared to the third quarter, and then decreased in the first quarter of the following year, reflecting the increase in customer demand we typically experience in this business in the fourth quarter. In addition, we typically experience our lowest overall revenue levels during the first quarter of each year. There is no assurance that these patterns will continue.
5. ACQUISITION
On April 4, 2018, we completed the acquisition of U.S.-based Atrenne, a designer and manufacturer of ruggedized electromechanical solutions, primarily for military and commercial aerospace applications. The purchase price for Atrenne was $141.7, net of cash acquired, including a net working capital adjustment of $3.8 (which is subject to finalization). The purchase was funded with borrowings under the revolving portion of our then-available credit facility. We recorded $64.0 of goodwill as part of the acquisition which is primarily attributable to the specific knowledge and capabilities of the acquired workforce and expected synergies from the combination of our operations. Details of our preliminary purchase price allocation are as follows:
12more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Atrenne | |||
Current assets, net of cash acquired | $ | 31.5 | |
Property, plant and equipment and other long-term assets | 7.8 | ||
Customer and other intangible assets and computer software assets | 51.0 | ||
Goodwill | 64.0 | ||
Current liabilities | (8.5 | ) | |
Deferred income taxes and other-long-term liabilities | (4.1 | ) | |
$ | 141.7 | ||
Acquired assets and liabilities are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. In connection with our purchase of Atrenne, we recorded a $1.6 fair value adjustment to write up the value of the acquired inventory as of the acquisition date, representing the difference between the inventory's cost and its fair value. The fair value adjustment is recognized through cost of sales as the inventory is sold. During the second quarter of 2018, we recognized the full $1.6 fair value adjustment (as such acquired inventory was sold during the quarter), which negatively impacted our gross profit and net earnings for the period. We have engaged third-party consultants to provide valuations of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in connection with our purchase of Atrenne. The fair value of the acquired tangible assets was measured based on their value in-use, by applying the market (sales comparison, brokers' quotes), cost or replacement cost, or the income (discounted cash flow ) approach, as deemed appropriate. The valuation of the intangible assets by the third-party consultants was primarily based on the income approach using a discounted cash flow model and forecasts based on management's subjective estimates and assumptions. Various Level 2 and 3 data inputs of the fair value measurement hierarchy were used in the valuation of the above-mentioned assets.
The fair value of certain assets in the table above, including customer intangible assets and working capital assets, have not been finalized. We expect to complete the valuation of these assets and to finalize our purchase price allocation in the third quarter of 2018.
We expect annual amortization of intangible assets to increase by approximately $6 as a result of the Atrenne acquisition. The goodwill arising from this acquisition is attributable to our ATS segment and is not tax deductible.
Proforma disclosure: Revenue and net earnings for the first half of 2018 would not have been materially different had the Atrenne acquisition occurred at the beginning of 2018.
We incur consulting, transaction and integration costs (Acquisition Costs) relating to potential and completed acquisitions. During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded Acquisition Costs of $2.2 and $3.9, respectively, including for the Atrenne acquisition (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $0.3 and $0.9 of Acquisition Costs, respectively), in other charges in our consolidated statement of operations.
6. SOLAR PANEL MANUFACTURING BUSINESS
During the fourth quarter of 2016, due to anticipated prolonged volatility in the solar panel market, we made the decision to exit the solar panel manufacturing business, and terminated (prior to its scheduled expiration) a supply agreement (Supply Agreement) pursuant to which we had made specific cash advances to an Asia-based solar cell supplier. The remaining $12.5 of such cash advances were repaid in full during the first half of 2017 (including $5.7 of cash advances repaid in the second quarter of 2017). In connection with our exit from this business, we wrote down the carrying values of our solar panel manufacturing equipment and inventories in 2016 to then-recoverable amounts. During the second quarter of 2017, we recorded additional provisions of $0.9 in cost of sales, $0.5 in SG&A expenses and $5.2 in other charges (see note 13) in our consolidated statement of operations, to write down the carrying value of our solar panel inventory, accounts receivable and solar panel manufacturing equipment, respectively.
13more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Under the Supply Agreement, we also manufactured and sold completed solar panels to the solar cell supplier as a customer. As of June 30, 2018, we had $3.7 (December 31, 2017 — $6.7) of outstanding solar accounts receivable, all from such former solar supplier, $1.0 of which was repaid in July 2018.
During the second quarter of 2018, we completed the sale of our remaining solar manufacturing equipment, which was previously recorded as assets held for sale. See note 9. In anticipation of such disposition, we paid $11.3 (including fees and accrued interest) in January 2018 to terminate and settle our outstanding lease obligations for this equipment. See note 11.
7. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable sales and financing programs:
We have an agreement to sell up to $200.0 of accounts receivable on an uncommitted basis (subject to pre-determined limits by customer) to two third-party banks. The term of this agreement has been annually extended in recent years (including in November 2017) for additional one-year periods (and is currently extendable to November 2019 under specified circumstances) but may be terminated earlier as provided in the agreement. At June 30, 2018, we sold $113.0 of accounts receivable under this program (December 31, 2017 — $80.0). We continue to collect cash from our customers and remit the cash to the banks once it is collected.
At June 30, 2018, we also sold $76.0 of accounts receivable under a customer's supplier financing program (December 31, 2017 — $52.3), pursuant to which participating suppliers may sell accounts receivable from such customer to a third-party bank on an uncommitted basis in order to receive earlier payment. We utilized this program to substantially offset the effect of extended payment terms required by such customer on our working capital for the period. The third-party bank collects the relevant receivables directly from the customer.
The accounts receivable sold under both of these programs are de-recognized from our accounts receivable balance and removed from our consolidated balance sheet, and the proceeds are reflected as cash provided by operating activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows. Upon sale, we assign the rights to the accounts receivable to the banks. We pay discount charges which we record as finance costs in our consolidated statement of operations.
Contract assets:
At June 30, 2018, our accounts receivable balance included $275.3 of contract assets (December 31, 2017 — $258.9) recognized as revenue under the transition to IFRS 15. See notes 2 and 3.
8. INVENTORIES
We record our inventory provisions, net of valuation recoveries, in cost of sales. We record inventory provisions to reflect write-downs in the value of our inventory to net realizable value, and valuation recoveries primarily to reflect realized gains on the disposition of inventory previously written-down to net realizable value. We recorded net inventory provisions of $8.1 and $9.1, respectively, for the second quarter and first half of 2018 (second quarter and first half of 2017 — net inventory provisions of $0.9 and $3.2, respectively). We recorded inventory provisions during the second quarter of 2018 as a result of an increase in our overall aged inventory levels, approximately three-quarters of which related to customers in our CCS segment. We recorded an inventory provision of $0.9 during the second quarter of 2017 to write down the carrying amount of our then-remaining solar panel inventory, the sale of which was completed during the third quarter of 2017. We regularly review our estimates and assumptions used to value our inventory through analysis of historical performance.
14more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
9. ASSETS CLASSIFIED AS HELD FOR SALE
As a result of previously announced restructuring actions, we have reclassified certain assets as held for sale. These assets were reclassified at the lower of their carrying value and estimated fair value less costs to sell at the time of such reclassification. We have programs underway to sell these assets. At June 30, 2018, we had $27.4 (December 31, 2017 — $30.1) of assets classified as held for sale, which consisted primarily of land and buildings in Europe and North America. See note 6 regarding the sale of our remaining solar panel manufacturing equipment during the second quarter of 2018.
10. PENSION AND NON-PENSION POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS
We provide pension and non-pension post-employment defined benefit plans for our employees. Such plans include defined benefit pension plans for our employees in the United Kingdom (U.K.) that generally provide them with stated benefits on retirement based on their pensionable service, either in annuities and/or lump sum payments. The U.K. defined benefit pension plans are comprised of a Main pension plan and a Supplementary pension plan, both of which are closed to new members. The Main pension plan is our largest defined benefit pension plan. The Supplementary pension plan does not have any active members.
In March 2017, the Trustees of the Main pension plan entered into an agreement with a third party insurance company to purchase an annuity for participants in such plan who have retired. The cost of the annuity was £123.7 million (approximately $154.3 at the exchange rate at the time of recording) and was funded with existing plan assets. The annuity is held as an asset of the Main pension plan. Although we retain ultimate responsibility for the payment of benefits to plan participants, the annuity substantially hedges the financial risk component of the associated pension obligations for such retired participants. The purchase of the annuity resulted in a non-cash loss of $17.0 which we recorded in OCI and simultaneously re-classified to deficit during the first quarter of 2017. We also reduced the value of our pension assets by $17.0 during the first quarter of 2017, which was recorded in other non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet. A true-up adjustment on the cost of this annuity is expected to be finalized in the third quarter of 2018, and we may be required to pay additional premium amounts to the insurance company in such period after completion of data verification of all retired participants.
In April 2017, the Trustees of our Supplementary pension plan entered into an agreement with a third party insurance company to purchase an annuity for all participants of this plan, all of whom are retired. The cost of the annuity was £9.1 million (approximately $11.7 at the exchange rate at the time of recording) and was funded with existing plan assets. The annuity is held as an asset of such plan. For the Supplementary pension plan, we anticipate transferring the pension annuity to individual plan members and winding up the plan in 2018. Although we retain ultimate responsibility for the payment of benefits to plan participants until such wind-up is complete, the annuity substantially hedges the financial risk component of the associated pension obligations for such retired participants. The purchase of the annuity resulted in a non-cash loss of $1.9 which we recorded in the second quarter of 2017 in other charges (see note 13) in our consolidated statement of operations, with a corresponding reduction in the value of our pension assets which is recorded in other non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet.
In June 2018, the Trustees of the Main pension plan entered into an agreement with a third party insurance company to purchase an annuity for participants in such plan who have not yet retired. The cost of the annuity was £156.1 million (approximately $209.2 at the exchange rate at the time of recording) and was funded with existing plan assets. The purchase of the annuity resulted in a non-cash loss of $63.3 for the second quarter of 2018 which we recorded in OCI and simultaneously re-classified to deficit, and the recognition of an additional pension obligation on our consolidated balance sheet after we fully reduced the pension asset to zero. The cost of this annuity is subject to a true-up adjustment within the next 12 months, and we may be required to pay additional premium amounts to the insurance company after completion of data verification for such non-retired participants.
.
11. CREDIT FACILITIES AND LONG-TERM DEBT
In June 2018, we entered into a $800.0 credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto (New Credit Facility), which provides for a $350.0 term loan (New Term Loan) that matures in June 2025, and a $450.0 revolving credit facility (New Revolver) that matures in June 2023. As of June 30, 2018, the full amount of the New
15more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Term Loan was outstanding, and other than ordinary course letters of credit (described below), there were no amounts outstanding under the New Revolver.
Our previous credit facility (Prior Facility) consisted of a $250.0 term loan (Prior Term Loan) and a $300.0 revolving credit facility (Prior Revolver), each of which was scheduled to mature in May 2020. See note 12 of our 2017 AFS for further details regarding the terms of our Prior Facility. The net proceeds from the New Term Loan were used primarily to repay all amounts outstanding under the Prior Facility (which was terminated on such repayment), as well as costs related to the arrangement of the New Credit Facility.
The New Term Loan requires quarterly principal repayments of $0.875, commencing September 30, 2018, and a lump sum repayment of the remainder outstanding at maturity. Commencing in 2020, we are also required to make annual prepayments of the New Term Loan ranging from 0% — 50% (based on a defined leverage ratio) of specified excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit Facility) for the prior fiscal year. Proceeds from the sale of our Toronto real property, if consummated after 2018, would be taken into account in the determination of excess cash flow. In addition, prepayments of all borrowings under the New Credit Facility may be required in the amount of specified net cash proceeds received above a specified annual threshold (including proceeds from the disposal of certain assets, but excluding the net proceeds from the sale of our Toronto real estate, if consummated). Except under specified circumstances, and subject to the payment of breakage costs (if any), we are generally permitted to make voluntary prepayments of outstanding amounts under the New Revolver and the New Term Loan without any other premium or penalty.
We incurred debt issuance costs of $4.9 in connection with the New Term Loan, which we recorded as an offset against the proceeds from the New Term Loan. Such costs have been deferred (as long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheet) and will be amortized over the term of the New Term Loan using the effective interest rate method. We incurred debt issuance costs of $3.1 in connection with the New Revolver, which have been deferred (as other assets on our consolidated balance sheet) and will be amortized over the term of the New Revolver. We accelerated the amortization of the remaining $1.2 of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the Prior Facility upon its termination ($0.6 related to our Prior Revolver recorded in other assets and $0.6 related to our Prior Term Loan recorded in long-term debt) and recorded it to other charges in our consolidated statement of operations in June 2018. See note 13.
The New Credit Facility has an accordion feature that allows us to increase the term loans and/or revolving loan commitments thereunder by an additional $150.0, plus an unlimited amount to the extent that a specified leverage ratio on a pro forma basis does not exceed specified limits, in each case on an uncommitted basis and subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions. The New Revolver also includes a $50.0 sub-limit for swing line loans, providing for short-term borrowings up to a maximum of ten business days, as well as a $150.0 sub-limit for letters of credit, in each case subject to the overall New Revolver credit limit. The New Revolver permits us and certain designated subsidiaries to borrow funds (subject to specified conditions) for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, certain acquisitions, and working capital needs. Borrowings under the New Revolver bear interest at LIBOR, Canadian Prime or Base Rate (each as defined in the New Credit Facility) plus a specified margin, or in the case of any bankers' acceptance, at the B/A Discount Rate (as defined in the New Credit Facility). The margin for borrowings under the New Revolver ranges from 0.75% to 2.5%, depending on the rate we select and our consolidated leverage ratio. The New Term Loan currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% (which we may change to the Base Rate plus a margin of 1% if more advantageous).
We are required to comply with certain restrictive covenants under the New Credit Facility, including those relating to the incurrence of certain indebtedness, the existence of certain liens, the sale of certain assets (excluding real property currently held for sale), specified investments and payments, sale and leaseback transactions, and certain financial covenants relating to a defined interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio that are tested on a quarterly basis. At June 30, 2018, we were in compliance with all restrictive and financial covenants under the New Credit Facility. The obligations under the New Credit Facility are guaranteed by us and certain specified subsidiaries. Subject to specified exemptions and limitations, all assets of the guarantors are pledged as security for the obligations under the New Credit Facility. The New Credit Facility contains customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the administrative agent may declare all amounts outstanding under the New Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable and may cancel the lenders’ commitments to make further advances thereunder. In the event of a payment or other specified defaults, outstanding obligations accrue interest at a specified default rate.
16more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
During the second quarter of 2018, we borrowed a total of $163.0 under the Prior Revolver, primarily to fund the Atrenne acquisition in April 2018 (see note 5), as well as for working capital requirements. We made a scheduled quarterly principal repayment of $6.25 during the second quarter of each of 2017 and 2018 (first half of each of 2017 and 2018 — $12.5) under the Prior Term Loan. The outstanding amounts under the Prior Revolver ($163.0) and the Prior Term Loan ($175.0) were repaid in June 2018 using the net proceeds from the New Term Loan. The Prior Facility was terminated on such repayment. During the first quarter of 2017, we made a repayment of $15.0 under the Prior Revolver.
The following table sets forth our borrowings under our credit facilities, and our finance lease obligations:
December 31 2017 | June 30 2018 | ||||||
Borrowings under the Prior Revolver/New Revolver (1) | $ | — | $ | — | |||
Borrowings under the Prior Term Loan/New Term Loan | 187.5 | 350.0 | |||||
Total borrowings under applicable credit facility | 187.5 | 350.0 | |||||
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs (2) | (0.8 | ) | (4.9 | ) | |||
Finance lease obligations (3) | 17.7 | 10.3 | |||||
$ | 204.4 | $ | 355.4 | ||||
Comprised of: | |||||||
Current portion of borrowings under applicable credit facility and finance lease obligations (2) | $ | 37.9 | $ | 8.3 | |||
Long-term portion of borrowings under applicable credit facility and finance lease obligations | 166.5 | 347.1 | |||||
$ | 204.4 | $ | 355.4 | ||||
(1) Debt issuance costs were incurred in connection with our Prior Revolver in 2014 ($1.7) and the New Revolver in 2018 ($3.1), which we deferred as other assets on our consolidated financial statements and amortize over the term of the relevant revolver. We accelerated the amortization of $0.6, representing the remaining portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs related to the Prior Revolver, upon termination of the Prior Facility, and recorded it to other charges in June 2018.
(2) Debt issuance costs were incurred in connection with our Prior Term Loan in 2015 ($2.1) and the New Term Loan in 2018 ($4.9), which we deferred as long-term debt on our consolidated financial statements and amortize over the term of the relevant term loans using the effective interest rate method. We accelerated the amortization of $0.6, representing the remaining portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs related to the Prior Term Loan, upon termination of the Prior Facility, and recorded it to other charges in June 2018.
(3) At December 31, 2017, $11.1 of our finance lease obligations related to our solar panel manufacturing equipment (recorded as current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2017). In connection with the anticipated disposition of such equipment, we terminated and settled these lease obligations in full in January 2018 for $11.3 (including fees and accrued interest). See note 6.
Commitment fees paid in the second quarter and first half of 2018 were $0.6 and $0.9, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $0.3 and $0.7, respectively). At June 30, 2018, we had $22.1 outstanding in letters of credit under the New Revolver (December 31, 2017 — $23.2 outstanding in letters of credit under the Prior Revolver). We also arrange letters of credit and surety bonds outside of our revolving facility. At June 30, 2018, we had $13.4 (December 31, 2017 — $13.6) of such letters of credit and surety bonds outstanding.
At June 30, 2018, we also had a total of $73.5 (December 31, 2017 — $73.5) in uncommitted bank overdraft facilities available for intraday and overnight operating requirements under our applicable credit facility. There were no amounts outstanding under these overdraft facilities at June 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017.
17more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
12. CAPITAL STOCK
Share repurchase plans:
In November 2017, the TSX accepted our notice to launch a new normal course issuer bid (2017 NCIB), which allows us to repurchase, at our discretion, until the earlier of November 12, 2018 or the completion of the purchases thereunder, up to approximately 10.5 million subordinate voting shares (representing approximately 7.3% of our total outstanding subordinate voting and multiple voting shares at the time of launch) in the open market, or as otherwise permitted. During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid $3.2 and $38.3, respectively (including transaction fees) to repurchase and cancel 0.3 million and 3.6 million subordinate voting shares, respectively, at a weighted average price of $12.28 per share and $10.75 per share, respectively. We did not repurchase any subordinate voting shares for cancellation during the first half of 2017. The maximum number of subordinate voting shares that we are permitted to repurchase for cancellation under the 2017 NCIB is reduced by the number of subordinate voting shares we purchase in the open market during the term of the 2017 NCIB to satisfy delivery obligations under our stock-based compensation plans. Since the commencement of this NCIB through June 30, 2018, we purchased an aggregate of 5.5 million subordinate voting shares for cancellation, and 1.1 million subordinate voting shares to satisfy delivery obligations under our stock-based compensation plans (see below).
Stock-based compensation:
We grant share unit awards to employees under our stock-based compensation plans. From time-to-time, we pay cash for the purchase by a broker of subordinate voting shares in the open market to satisfy delivery requirements upon vesting of such awards. For accounting purposes, we classify these shares as treasury stock until they are delivered pursuant to the stock-based compensation plans. During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we paid $5.3 and $9.6 (including transaction fees), respectively, for a broker to purchase 0.4 million and 0.8 million subordinate voting shares in the open market, respectively, to satisfy delivery requirements under our stock-based compensation plans. During the second quarter and first half of 2017, we paid $5.2 and $6.5 (including transaction fees), respectively, for a broker to purchase 0.37 million and 0.46 million subordinate voting shares in the open market, respectively, for awards under our stock-based compensation plans. At June 30, 2018, the broker held 1.0 million subordinate voting shares with a value of $11.9 (December 31, 2017 — 0.8 million subordinate voting shares with a value of $8.7).
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we granted 0.1 million and 1.8 million restricted share units (RSUs), respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — 0.1 million and 1.5 million RSUs, respectively), which vest one-third per year over a three-year period. The cost we record for RSUs is based on the market value of our subordinate voting shares at the time of grant. During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we granted 0.1 million and 1.6 million performance share units (PSUs), respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — nil and 0.9 million PSUs, respectively), representing 100% of target. Employees are granted a target number of PSUs. The number of PSUs granted during 2018 that will actually vest will vary from 0 to 200% of the target amount granted based on the level of achievement of a pre-determined non-market performance measurement in the final year of the three-year performance period, as modified by a separate pre-determined non-market financial target, as well as our relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance over the vesting period. See note 2(n) of our 2017 AFS for a description of TSR. We estimated the grant date fair value of the TSR modifier for these awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The grant date fair value for the non-TSR-based performance measurement and modifier was based on the market value of our subordinate voting shares at the time of grant and may be adjusted in subsequent periods to reflect a change in the estimated level of achievement related to the applicable performance condition. We amortize the cost of our awards to compensation expense in our consolidated statement of operations, with a corresponding charge to contributed surplus on our consolidated balance sheet on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, and we reduce this expense for the estimated PSU awards that are not expected to vest because employment conditions are not expected to be satisfied. We expect to settle these awards with subordinate voting shares purchased in the open market by a broker or issued from treasury. The weighted average grant date fair value of RSUs granted in the second quarter and first half of 2018 was $11.95 and $10.58 per unit, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $13.96 and $13.68, respectively). The weighted average grant date fair value of PSUs granted in the second quarter and first half of 2018 was $11.98 and $11.13 per unit, respectively (first quarter of 2017 — $17.18). See note 13(b) of our 2017 AFS for a description of the vesting terms applicable to PSUs granted in the first half of 2017.
18more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we received cash proceeds of $0.2 and $0.4, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $3.4 and $13.2, respectively) relating to the exercise of vested employee stock options.
For the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded aggregate employee stock-based compensation expense (excluding deferred share units (DSU) expense) through cost of sales and SG&A of $7.2 and $17.6, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $5.7 and $16.7, respectively), and DSU expense (recorded through SG&A) of $0.5 and $1.0, respectively (second quarter and first half of 2017 — $0.6 and $1.2, respectively). Employee stock-based compensation expense varies from period-to-period.
At June 30, 2018, 1.5 million (December 31, 2017 — 1.5 million) DSUs were outstanding.
13. OTHER CHARGES
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring (a) | $ | 5.8 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 11.6 | $ | 15.7 | |||||||
Loss on pension annuity purchase (see note 10) | 1.9 | — | 1.9 | — | |||||||||||
Toronto transition costs (b) | — | 3.5 | — | 5.2 | |||||||||||
Accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs (c) | — | 1.2 | — | 1.2 | |||||||||||
Other (d) | 0.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 4.2 | |||||||||||
$ | 8.0 | $ | 15.8 | $ | 15.6 | $ | 26.3 | ||||||||
(a) Restructuring:
We perform ongoing evaluations of our business, operational efficiency and cost structure, and implement restructuring actions as we deem necessary. In response to challenging markets and continued margin pressures (driven primarily by volatility in our CCS segment), we announced in October 2017 our intention to implement additional restructuring actions in the near term to further streamline our business and improve our margin performance, and our related engagement of an outside consultant to identify cost reduction opportunities throughout our network, including through increased operational efficiencies and productivity improvements. In connection therewith, we are implementing restructuring actions under a cost efficiency initiative. Such initiative will include reductions to our workforce, as well as potential consolidation of certain sites to better align capacity and infrastructure with current and anticipated customer demand, related transfers of customer programs and production, re-alignment of business processes, management reorganizations, and other associated activities. We have recorded $23.7 in restructuring charges from the commencement of our cost efficiency initiative through the end of the second quarter of 2018, including the $8.8 and $15.7 of restructuring charges recorded in the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively.
We recorded restructuring charges of $8.8 during the second quarter of 2018 consisting of cash charges of $8.9, primarily for consultant costs and employee termination costs, offset in part by a non-cash recovery of $0.1, representing gains on the sale of surplus equipment. We recorded restructuring charges of $15.7 during the first half of 2018, consisting of cash charges of $15.5, primarily for consultant costs and employee termination costs, and non-cash charges of $0.2, representing losses on the sale of surplus equipment. We recorded restructuring charges of $5.8 and $11.6 during the second quarter and first half of 2017, respectively, consisting of cash charges of $0.6 and $6.4, respectively, primarily for employee termination costs resulting from the implementation of our Organizational Design and Global Business Services initiatives, and non-cash charges of $5.2 for the second quarter and first half of 2017, to further write down the carrying value of our solar panel manufacturing equipment which we have since sold (see note 6). As of June 30, 2018, our restructuring provision was $12.4 (December 31, 2017 — $12.7), which we recorded in current portion of provisions on our consolidated balance sheet.
19more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(b) Toronto transition costs:
In connection with the anticipated sale of our Toronto real property, we entered into a long-term lease in November 2017 (in the Greater Toronto area) for the relocation of our Toronto manufacturing operations, and commenced occupancy in March 2018. We currently expect to complete the transition to this new manufacturing location by the end of first quarter of 2019. In addition, should the sale be consummated, we have agreed to enter into a short-term interim lease for our existing corporate headquarters and manufacturing premises on a portion of the real estate on a rent-free basis (subject to certain payments including taxes and utilities), which is to be followed by a long-term lease with the purchasers of our Toronto real property for our new corporate headquarters. In connection therewith, we intend to move such corporate headquarters to a temporary location while space in a new office building (to be built by such purchasers on the site of our current location) is under construction. The temporary office relocation is currently expected to occur by the end of the first quarter of 2019. We will incur significant costs throughout the transition period (which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2017) to relocate our corporate headquarters and to transfer our Toronto manufacturing operations to its new location, and as we prepare and customize the new site to meet our manufacturing needs. These costs will consist of building improvements and new equipment which we will capitalize (approximately $8 and $10 in the second quarter and first half of 2018, respectively), as well as transition-related costs which we will record in other charges. Transition costs are comprised of direct relocation costs, duplicate costs (such as rent expense, utility costs, depreciation charges, and personnel costs) incurred during the transition period, as well as cease-use costs incurred in connection with idle or vacated portions of the relevant premises that we would not have incurred but for these relocations. Any amounts we receive from the purchasers of our Toronto real property or gains recorded in connection with its sale, if consummated, will be recorded as recoveries through other charges (recoveries). During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded $3.5 and $5.2, respectively, of such transition costs (second quarter and first half of 2017 — nil), consisting primarily of utility costs related to idle premises, depreciation charges and personnel costs used in the operation of duplicate production lines in advance of the transition, and relocation costs. See notes 16 (d) and 18 to our 2017 AFS.
(c) Accelerated amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs:
During the second quarter of 2018, we recorded a $1.2 charge to accelerate the amortization of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the extinguishment of the Prior Facility (see note 11).
(d) Other:
During the second quarter and first half of 2018, we recorded $2.2 and $3.9, respectively, of Acquisition Costs (see note 5). During the second quarter and first half of 2017, we recorded $0.3 and $0.9, respectively, of Acquisition Costs related to an acquisition we completed in the fourth quarter of 2016. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2017, we recorded costs related to a prior legal matter.
14. INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate can vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter for various reasons, including as a result of the mix and volume of business in various tax jurisdictions within the Americas, Europe and Asia, in jurisdictions with tax holidays and tax incentives, and in jurisdictions for which no net deferred income tax assets have been recognized because management believed it was not probable that future taxable profit would be available against which tax losses and deductible temporary differences could be utilized. Our effective income tax rate can also vary due to the impact of restructuring charges, foreign exchange fluctuations, operating losses, cash repatriations, and changes in our provisions related to tax uncertainties.
During the second quarter of 2018, we received a favorable conclusion to our application for a bi-lateral advance pricing arrangement (BAPA) between the United States and Mexican tax authorities. Accordingly, we reversed $6.0 of Mexican income taxes previously accrued (Mexican Tax Reversal) to reflect the approved BAPA terms. In addition, as a result of our Atrenne acquisition, we recognized $3.7 of previously unrecognized deferred tax assets in our U.S. group of subsidiaries (Atrenne Benefit), which partially offset the net deferred tax liabilities that arose in connection with such acquisition. These income tax benefits were offset in part by additional taxes due to an increased proportion of profits earned in taxable jurisdictions, and adverse taxable foreign exchange
20more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
impacts arising from the weakening of the Malaysian ringgit, Chinese renminbi and Thai baht relative to the U.S. dollar (our functional currency), each in the second quarter of 2018. Our net income tax expense for the first half of 2018 was favorably impacted by the Mexican Tax Reversal and the Atrenne Benefit, offset in part by additional taxes due to an increased proportion of profits earned in taxable jurisdictions. The net impact of taxable foreign exchange on our net income tax expense for the first half of 2018 was not significant.
During the second quarter of 2017, we recognized a $5.0 deferred income tax benefit related to the write-down and impairments we recorded for our solar assets in the then-current period and prior quarters. In connection with our exit from the solar panel manufacturing business, we withdrew one of our tax incentives in Thailand (which related solely to such operations) during the second quarter of 2017. The withdrawal of this incentive allowed us to apply future tax losses arising from the ultimate disposition of our solar assets against other fully taxable profits in Thailand, resulting in the recognition of the deferred income tax benefit. The impact of taxable foreign exchange on our net income tax expense for the second quarter and first half of 2017 was not significant.
We are subject to tax audits of historical information by tax authorities in various jurisdictions, which could result in additional tax expense in future periods relating to prior results. Reviews by tax authorities generally focus on, but are not limited to, the validity of our inter-company transactions, including financing and transfer pricing policies which generally involve subjective areas of taxation and a significant degree of judgment. If any of these tax authorities are successful with their challenges, our income tax expense may be adversely affected and we could also be subject to interest and penalty charges.
The successful pursuit of assertions made by any taxing authority could result in our owing significant amounts of tax, interest and possibly penalties. We believe we adequately accrue for any probable potential adverse tax ruling. However, there can be no assurance as to the final resolution of any claims and any resulting proceedings. If any claims and any ensuing proceedings are determined adversely to us, the amounts we may be required to pay could be material, and could be in excess of amounts accrued.
15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Our financial assets are comprised primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and derivatives used for hedging purposes. Our financial liabilities are comprised primarily of accounts payable, certain accrued and other liabilities and provisions, the New Term Loan, borrowings under the New Revolver (when applicable), and derivatives. See note 2 for changes to the classification of our financial assets and liabilities since December 31, 2017 as a result of adopting IFRS 9.
Currency risk:
The majority of our currency risk is driven by operational costs, including income tax expense, incurred in local currencies by our subsidiaries. As part of our risk management program, we attempt to mitigate currency risk through a hedging program using forecasts of our anticipated future cash flows and balance sheet exposures denominated in foreign currencies. We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts and swaps, generally for periods up to 12 months, to lock in the exchange rates for future foreign currency transactions, which is intended to reduce the variability of our operating costs and future cash flows denominated in local currencies. While these contracts are intended to reduce the effects of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, our hedging strategy does not mitigate the longer-term impacts of changes to foreign exchange rates. Our major currency exposures at June 30, 2018 are summarized in U.S. dollar equivalents in the following table. In the table below, in addition to our financial instruments, we have included certain monetary assets and liabilities, including pension and non-pension post-employment benefits to employees and income taxes that were denominated in non-functional currencies, in order to better reflect our currency exposures. The local currency amounts have been converted to U.S. dollar equivalents using spot rates at June 30, 2018.
21more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Canadian dollar | Euro | Thai baht | Chinese renminbi | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3.9 | $ | 7.7 | $ | 3.2 | $ | 10.0 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 1.4 | 33.0 | 0.6 | 11.7 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes and value-added taxes receivable | 18.3 | 24.2 | 6.0 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||
Other financial assets | — | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Pension and non-pension post-employment liabilities | (72.0 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (13.0 | ) | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||
Income taxes and value-added taxes payable | (3.0 | ) | (1.1 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and certain accrued and other liabilities and provisions | (45.3 | ) | (33.7 | ) | (17.7 | ) | (23.9 | ) | ||||||||
Net financial assets (liabilities) | $ | (96.7 | ) | $ | 31.7 | $ | (20.6 | ) | $ | 11.1 | ||||||
We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge our cash flow exposures and foreign currency swaps to hedge our balance sheet exposures. At June 30, 2018, we had foreign exchange forwards and swaps to trade U.S. dollars in exchange for the following currencies:
Currency | Contract amount in U.S. dollars | Weighted average exchange rate in U.S. dollars | Maximum period in months | Fair value gain (loss) | |||||||||
Canadian dollar | $ | 236.8 | $ | 0.78 | 12 | $ | (6.6 | ) | |||||
Thai baht | 81.5 | 0.03 | 12 | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||
Malaysian ringgit | 51.0 | 0.25 | 12 | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||
Mexican peso | 30.7 | 0.05 | 12 | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||
British pound | 3.8 | 1.37 | 1 | 3.8 | |||||||||
Chinese renminbi | 76.0 | 0.15 | 12 | (1.0 | ) | ||||||||
Euro | 29.3 | 1.21 | 12 | 0.9 | |||||||||
Romanian leu | 37.9 | 0.26 | 12 | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||
Singapore dollar | 24.7 | 0.75 | 12 | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||
Other | 4.5 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 576.2 | $ | (8.9 | ) | ||||||||
At June 30, 2018, the fair value of our outstanding contracts was a net unrealized loss of $8.9 (December 31, 2017 — net unrealized gain of $10.3). At June 30, 2018, we recorded $7.5 of derivative assets in other current assets and $16.4 of derivative liabilities in accrued and other current liabilities (December 31, 2017 — $12.9 of derivative assets in other current assets and $2.6 of derivative liabilities in accrued and other current liabilities). The unrealized gains or losses result from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between the date the currency forward or swap contracts were entered into and the valuation date at period end.
22more...
CELESTICA INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
16. CONTINGENCIES
Litigation:
In the normal course of our operations, we may be subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims, including environmental, labor, product, customer disputes and other matters. Management believes that adequate provisions have been recorded where required. Although it is not always possible to estimate the extent of potential costs, if any, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending matters will not have a material adverse impact on our financial performance, financial position or liquidity.
Other Matters:
In the third quarter of 2017, the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications (MCTIC) issued assessments seeking to disqualify certain amounts of research and development (R&D) expenses for the years 2006 to 2009, which entitled our Brazilian subsidiary (which ceased operations in 2009) to charge reduced sales tax levies to its customers. The assessments against our Brazilian subsidiary (including interest and penalties) total approximately 39 million Brazilian real (approximately $10 at period-end exchange rates) for such years. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, we believe that our R&D activities for the period are supportable, and it is probable that our position will be sustained upon full examination by the appropriate Brazilian authorities and, if necessary, upon consideration by the Brazilian judicial courts. Our position is supported by our Brazilian legal advisers.
23
Exhibit 99.3
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert A. Mionis, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 6-K of Celestica Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 1, 2018 | |
/s/ Robert A. Mionis | |
Robert A. Mionis | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
Exhibit 99.4
CERTIFICATION
I, Mandeep Chawla, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 6-K of Celestica Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 1, 2018 | |
/s/ Mandeep Chawla | |
Mandeep Chawla | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
Exhibit 99.5
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the report of Celestica Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 6-K for the period ended June 30, 2018, as furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of Robert A. Mionis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mandeep Chawla, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
August 1, 2018 | |
/s/ Robert A. Mionis | |
Robert A. Mionis | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
August 1, 2018 | |
/s/ Mandeep Chawla | |
Mandeep Chawla | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The information that you are accessing on this website may include forward-looking statements related to our future growth, trends in our industry, our financial and operational results and performance that are based on current expectations, forecast and assumptions involving risk and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially.
Read the full Cautionary Note here